NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Schochet, Peter Z. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2009
This paper examines the estimation of two-stage clustered RCT designs in education research using the Neyman causal inference framework that underlies experiments. The key distinction between the considered causal models is whether potential treatment and control group outcomes are considered to be fixed for the study population (the…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Causal Models, Statistical Significance, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hursch, Thomas Mercer – American Biology Teacher, 1979
Two statistical tools, the Chi-square and standard error approaches, are compared for use in Mendelian genetics experiments. Although the Chi-square technique is more often used, the standard error approach is to be preferred for both research investigations and student experiments. (BB)
Descriptors: Biological Sciences, Biology, Error of Measurement, Genetics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blasiak, Wladyslaw – Physics Education, 1983
Classifies errors as either systematic or blunder and uncertainties as either systematic or random. Discusses use of error/uncertainty analysis in direct/indirect measurement, describing the process of planning experiments to ensure lowest possible uncertainty. Also considers appropriate level of error analysis for high school physics students'…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Error Patterns, High Schools, Mathematics Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hudgins, R. R.; Reilly, P. M. – Chemical Engineering Education, 1989
Discussed are problems encountered when a gas absorption experiment with strong measurement error is used. Notes students either avoid the experiment or report it as defective. Provides ideas to make lab experiments more instructive. (MVL)
Descriptors: Chemical Analysis, Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, College Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Deacon, Christopher G. – Physics Teacher, 1992
Describes two simple methods of error analysis: (1) combining errors in the measured quantities; and (2) calculating the error or uncertainty in the slope of a straight-line graph. Discusses significance of the error in the comparison of experimental results with some known value. (MDH)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Goodness of Fit, High Schools, Higher Education