NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 24 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Inga Laukaityte; Marie Wiberg – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2024
The overall aim was to examine effects of differences in group ability and features of the anchor test form on equating bias and the standard error of equating (SEE) using both real and simulated data. Chained kernel equating, Postratification kernel equating, and Circle-arc equating were studied. A college admissions test with four different…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Test Items, College Entrance Examinations, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huggins-Manley, Anne Corinne – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
This study defines subpopulation item parameter drift (SIPD) as a change in item parameters over time that is dependent on subpopulations of examinees, and hypothesizes that the presence of SIPD in anchor items is associated with bias and/or lack of invariance in three psychometric outcomes. Results show that SIPD in anchor items is associated…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Test Items, Item Response Theory, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Öztürk-Gübes, Nese; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2016
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of dimensionality, common-item set format, and different scale linking methods on preserving equity property with mixed-format test equating. Item response theory (IRT) true-score equating (TSE) and IRT observed-score equating (OSE) methods were used under common-item nonequivalent groups design.…
Descriptors: Test Format, Item Response Theory, True Scores, Equated Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Li, Yanmei – ETS Research Report Series, 2012
In a common-item (anchor) equating design, the common items should be evaluated for item parameter drift. Drifted items are often removed. For a test that contains mostly dichotomous items and only a small number of polytomous items, removing some drifted polytomous anchor items may result in anchor sets that no longer resemble mini-versions of…
Descriptors: Scores, Item Response Theory, Equated Scores, Simulation
Moses, Tim; Zhang, Wenmin – Educational Testing Service, 2010
In this paper, the "standard error of equating difference" (SEED) is described in terms of originally proposed kernel equating functions (von Davier, Holland, & Thayer, 2004) and extended to incorporate traditional linear and equipercentile functions. These derivations expand on prior developments of SEEDs and standard errors of equating and…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Simulation, Testing, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wang, Lin; Qian, Jiahe; Lee, Yi-Hsuan – ETS Research Report Series, 2013
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combined effects of reduced equating sample size and shortened anchor test length on item response theory (IRT)-based linking and equating results. Data from two independent operational forms of a large-scale testing program were used to establish the baseline results for evaluating the results from…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Item Response Theory, Testing Programs, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moses, Tim; Zhang, Wenmin – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2011
The purpose of this article was to extend the use of standard errors for equated score differences (SEEDs) to traditional equating functions. The SEEDs are described in terms of their original proposal for kernel equating functions and extended so that SEEDs for traditional linear and traditional equipercentile equating functions can be computed.…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Error Patterns, Evaluation Research, Statistical Analysis
Duong, Minh Quang – ProQuest LLC, 2011
Testing programs often use multiple test forms of the same test to control item exposure and to ensure test security. Although test forms are constructed to be as similar as possible, they often differ. Test equating techniques are those statistical methods used to adjust scores obtained on different test forms of the same test so that they are…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis, Item Response Theory, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Duong, Minh Q.; von Davier, Alina A. – International Journal of Testing, 2012
Test equating is a statistical procedure for adjusting for test form differences in difficulty in a standardized assessment. Equating results are supposed to hold for a specified target population (Kolen & Brennan, 2004; von Davier, Holland, & Thayer, 2004) and to be (relatively) independent of the subpopulations from the target population (see…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Difficulty Level, Psychometrics, Statistical Analysis
Tian, Feng – ProQuest LLC, 2011
There has been a steady increase in the use of mixed-format tests, that is, tests consisting of both multiple-choice items and constructed-response items in both classroom and large-scale assessments. This calls for appropriate equating methods for such tests. As Item Response Theory (IRT) has rapidly become mainstream as the theoretical basis for…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Tianyou – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009
Holland and colleagues derived a formula for analytical standard error of equating using the delta-method for the kernel equating method. Extending their derivation, this article derives an analytical standard error of equating procedure for the conventional percentile rank-based equipercentile equating with log-linear smoothing. This procedure is…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moses, Tim; Holland, Paul W. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
In this study, we compared 12 statistical strategies proposed for selecting loglinear models for smoothing univariate test score distributions and for enhancing the stability of equipercentile equating functions. The major focus was on evaluating the effects of the selection strategies on equating function accuracy. Selection strategies' influence…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Selection, Statistical Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Moses, Tim; Holland, Paul – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
This study addressed 2 issues of using loglinear models for smoothing univariate test score distributions and for enhancing the stability of equipercentile equating functions. One issue was a comparative assessment of several statistical strategies that have been proposed for selecting 1 from several competing model parameterizations. Another…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Selection, Models, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goldman, Robert N.; McKenzie, John D. Jr. – Teaching Statistics: An International Journal for Teachers, 2009
We explain how to simulate both univariate and bivariate raw data sets having specified values for common summary statistics. The first example illustrates how to "construct" a data set having prescribed values for the mean and the standard deviation--for a one-sample t test with a specified outcome. The second shows how to create a bivariate data…
Descriptors: Correlation, Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moses, Tim – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2008
Equating functions are supposed to be population invariant, meaning that the choice of subpopulation used to compute the equating function should not matter. The extent to which equating functions are population invariant is typically assessed in terms of practical difference criteria that do not account for equating functions' sampling…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Sampling, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2