NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kulinskaya, Elena; Hoaglin, David C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
For estimation of heterogeneity variance T[superscript 2] in meta-analysis of log-odds-ratio, we derive new mean- and median-unbiased point estimators and new interval estimators based on a generalized Q statistic, Q[subscript F], in which the weights depend on only the studies' effective sample sizes. We compare them with familiar estimators…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Statistical Analysis, Meta Analysis, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seide, Svenja E.; Jensen, Katrin; Kieser, Meinhard – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
The performance of statistical methods is often evaluated by means of simulation studies. In case of network meta-analysis of binary data, however, simulations are not currently available for many practically relevant settings. We perform a simulation study for sparse networks of trials under between-trial heterogeneity and including multi-arm…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Data Analysis, Networks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alinaghi, Nazila; Reed, W. Robert – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
This paper studies the performance of the FAT-PET-PEESE (FPP) procedure, a commonly employed approach for addressing publication bias in the economics and business meta-analysis literature. The FPP procedure is generally used for 3 purposes: (1) to test whether a sample of estimates suffers from publication bias, (2) to test whether the estimates…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Publications, Statistical Bias, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rubio-Aparicio, María; López-López, José Antonio; Sánchez-Meca, Julio; Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Van den Noortgate, Wim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
The random-effects model, applied in most meta-analyses nowadays, typically assumes normality of the distribution of the effect parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of various random-effects methods (standard method, Hartung's method, profile likelihood method, and bootstrapping) for computing an average effect size…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kontopantelis, Evangelos – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Background: Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis allows for the exploration of heterogeneity and can identify subgroups that most benefit from an intervention (or exposure), much more successfully than meta-analysis of aggregate data. One-stage or two-stage IPD meta-analysis is possible, with the former using mixed-effects regression models…
Descriptors: Patients, Medical Research, Meta Analysis, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
López-López, José Antonio; Van den Noortgate, Wim; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Wilson, Sandra Jo; Lipsey, Mark W. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Dependent effect sizes are ubiquitous in meta-analysis. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we compared the performance of 2 methods for meta-regression with dependent effect sizes--robust variance estimation (RVE) and 3-level modeling--with the standard meta-analytic method for independent effect sizes. We further compared bias-reduced linearization…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Regression (Statistics), Meta Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stanley, T. D.; Doucouliagos, Hristos – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
Publication selection bias is a serious challenge to the integrity of all empirical sciences. We derive meta-regression approximations to reduce this bias. Our approach employs Taylor polynomial approximations to the conditional mean of a truncated distribution. A quadratic approximation without a linear term, precision-effect estimate with…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Bias, Algebra, Mathematical Formulas