NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers7
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 45 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gomm, Roger – British Educational Research Journal, 2022
This is a methodological critique of research by the Best Practice in Grouping Students (BPGS) project claiming teacher bias in allocating students to first-year secondary school mathematics teaching sets ("British Educational Research Journal," 45(4), 873-897 [EJ1223692]). The research assumes that bias could be shown by non-random…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Secondary School Students, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taber, Keith S. – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2020
This comment discusses some issues about the use and reporting of experimental studies in education, illustrated by a recently published study that claimed (i) that an educational innovation was effective despite outcomes not reaching statistical significance, and (ii) that this refuted the findings of an earlier study. The two key issues raised…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Educational Innovation, Statistical Significance, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gorard, Stephen; White, Patrick – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2017
In their response to our paper, Nicholson and Ridgway agree with the majority of what we wrote. They echo our concerns about the misuse of inferential statistics and NHST in particular. Very little of their response explicitly challenges the points we made but where it does their defence of the use of inferential techniques does not stand up to…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Statistics, Statistical Significance, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wainer, Howard – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
The usual role of a discussant is to clarify and correct the paper being discussed, but in this case, the author, Howard Wainer, generally agrees with everything David Thissen says in his essay, "Bad Questions: An Essay Involving Item Response Theory." This essay expands on David Thissen's statement that there are typically two principal…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Educational Assessment, Sample Size, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicholson, James; Ridgway, Jim – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2017
White and Gorard make important and relevant criticisms of some of the methods commonly used in social science research, but go further by criticising the logical basis for inferential statistical tests. This paper comments briefly on matters we broadly agree on with them and more fully on matters where we disagree. We agree that too little…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Statistics, Teaching Methods, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salverda, Anne Pier – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Lieberman, Borovsky, Hatrak, and Mayberry (2015) used a modified version of the visual-world paradigm to examine the real-time processing of signs in American Sign Language. They examined the activation of phonological and semantic competitors in native signers and late-learning signers and concluded that their results provide evidence that the…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Deafness, Native Speakers, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Callister Everson, Kimberlee; Feinauer, Erika; Sudweeks, Richard R. – Harvard Educational Review, 2013
In this article, the authors provide a methodological critique of the current standard of value-added modeling forwarded in educational policy contexts as a means of measuring teacher effectiveness. Conventional value-added estimates of teacher quality are attempts to determine to what degree a teacher would theoretically contribute, on average,…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jo, Booil; Stuart, Elizabeth A. – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2012
The authors thank Dr. Lindsay Page for providing a nice illustration of the use of the principal stratification framework to define causal effects, and a Bayesian model for effect estimation. They hope that her well-written article will help expose education researchers to these concepts and methods, and move the field of mediation analysis in…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Educational Experiments, Educational Research, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Osborne, Jason W. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2013
Osborne and Waters (2002) focused on checking some of the assumptions of multiple linear regression. In a critique of that paper, Williams, Grajales, and Kurkiewicz correctly clarify that regression models estimated using ordinary least squares require the assumption of normally distributed errors, but not the assumption of normally distributed…
Descriptors: Multiple Regression Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roth, Wolff-Michael – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011
In the wake of an increasing political commitment to evidence-based decision making and evidence-based educational reform that emerged with the No Child Left Behind effort, the question of what counts as evidence has become increasingly important in the field of science education. In current public discussions, academics, politicians, and other…
Descriptors: Science Education, Educational Research, Evidence, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shrout, Patrick E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
Maxwell, Cole, and Mitchell (2011) extended the work of Maxwell and Cole (2007), which raised important questions about whether mediation analyses based on cross-sectional data can shed light on longitudinal mediation process. The latest article considers longitudinal processes that can only be partially explained by an intervening variable, and…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Psychopathology, Peer Mediation, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erard, Robert E. – American Psychologist, 2009
Comments on a paper by H. S. Kim, D. K. Sherman, and S. E. Taylor in regards to the consideration of culture, ethnicity, and national origin in the study of individual and group differences and social interactions. Erard claims that their attempt to infer from small, mostly college-student samples examined on a handful of variables in a few dozen…
Descriptors: Sampling, Statistical Inference, Reader Response, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reichardt, Charles S. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
Maxwell, Cole, and Mitchell (2011) demonstrated that simple structural equation models, when used with cross-sectional data, generally produce biased estimates of meditated effects. I extend those results by showing how simple structural equation models can produce biased estimates of meditated effects when used even with longitudinal data. Even…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Data, Longitudinal Studies, Error of Measurement
Wang, Jianjun – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2008
As an alternative to statistical testing, effect size has a non-monotonic linkage with practical importance. Besides random variance and systematic bias, a proper interpretation of effect size hinges on its implication to outcomes of deductive and/or inductive enquiries. Consequently, a small effect size might suggest an important finding, and the…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Statistical Significance, Statistical Inference, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
LoSchiavo, Frank M.; Shatz, Mark A. – American Psychologist, 2009
Comments on an article by J. J. Arnett regarding the assertion that American psychology focuses too narrowly on Americans while neglecting the other 95% of the world's population. The authors' comments focus on why American psychologists have become overreliant on American samples, and they provide alternative suggestions for broadening the scope…
Descriptors: Psychological Studies, Sample Size, Cross Cultural Studies, Cultural Differences
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3