NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keselman, H. J.; Miller, Charles W.; Holland, Burt – Psychological Methods, 2011
There have been many discussions of how Type I errors should be controlled when many hypotheses are tested (e.g., all possible comparisons of means, correlations, proportions, the coefficients in hierarchical models, etc.). By and large, researchers have adopted familywise (FWER) control, though this practice certainly is not universal. Familywise…
Descriptors: Validity, Statistical Significance, Probability, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Compares the harmonic mean and Kramer unequal group forms of the Tukey test for various: (a) degrees of disparate group sizes, (b) numbers of groups, and (c) nominal significant levels. (RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Probability, Sampling, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Investigates the Tukey statistic for the empirical probability of a Type II error under numerous parametric specifications defined by Cohen (1969) as being representative of behavioral research data. For unequal numbers of observations per treatment group and for unequal population variancies, the Tukey test was simulated when sampling from a…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
This paper demonstrates that multiple comparison tests using a pooled error term are dependent on the circularity assumption and shows how to compute tests which are insensitive (robust) to this assumption. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models, Research Design, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J.; Toothaker, Larry E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
The need for multiple comparison procedures for repeated measures means employing a pooled estimate of error variance to conform to the sphericity assumptions of the design in order to provide a valid test is discussed. An alternative approach which does not require this assumption is presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design