Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Statistical Significance | 6 |
Hypothesis Testing | 4 |
Analysis of Variance | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Probability | 3 |
Research Design | 2 |
Computation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Error Correction | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Literature | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Keselman, H. J. | 6 |
Holland, Burt | 1 |
Miller, Charles W. | 1 |
Toothaker, Larry E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Keselman, H. J.; Miller, Charles W.; Holland, Burt – Psychological Methods, 2011
There have been many discussions of how Type I errors should be controlled when many hypotheses are tested (e.g., all possible comparisons of means, correlations, proportions, the coefficients in hierarchical models, etc.). By and large, researchers have adopted familywise (FWER) control, though this practice certainly is not universal. Familywise…
Descriptors: Validity, Statistical Significance, Probability, Computation

Keselman, H. J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Compares the harmonic mean and Kramer unequal group forms of the Tukey test for various: (a) degrees of disparate group sizes, (b) numbers of groups, and (c) nominal significant levels. (RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Probability, Sampling, Statistical Significance

Keselman, H. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Investigates the Tukey statistic for the empirical probability of a Type II error under numerous parametric specifications defined by Cohen (1969) as being representative of behavioral research data. For unequal numbers of observations per treatment group and for unequal population variancies, the Tukey test was simulated when sampling from a…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Probability

Keselman, H. J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
This paper demonstrates that multiple comparison tests using a pooled error term are dependent on the circularity assumption and shows how to compute tests which are insensitive (robust) to this assumption. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models, Research Design, Statistical Significance

Keselman, H. J.; Toothaker, Larry E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology

Keselman, H. J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982
The need for multiple comparison procedures for repeated measures means employing a pooled estimate of error variance to conform to the sphericity assumptions of the design in order to provide a valid test is discussed. An alternative approach which does not require this assumption is presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design