Descriptor
Analysis of Covariance | 4 |
Nonparametric Statistics | 4 |
Statistical Significance | 4 |
Hypothesis Testing | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Power (Statistics) | 2 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Computer Simulation | 1 |
Goodness of Fit | 1 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
Research Methodology | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Levy, Kenneth J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) is robust with respect to dual violations of the assumptions of equal regression slopes and normality of distributions provided that group sizes are equal, but displays disruptions of empirical significant levels when unequal regression slopes and unequal group sizes are coupled with nonnormal distributions.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Nonparametric Statistics, Statistical Significance

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1984
Using computer simulation, parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was compared to ANCOVA with data transformed using ranks, in terms of proportion of Type I errors and statistical power. Results indicated that parametric ANCOVA was robust to violations of either normality or homoscedasticity, but practiced significant power differences favored…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Computer Simulation, Hypothesis Testing, Nonparametric Statistics

Olejnik, Stephen F.; Algina, James – Evaluation Review, 1985
Five distribution-free alternatives to parametric analysis of covariance are presented and demonstrated: Quade's distribution-free test, Puri and Sen's solution, McSweeney and Porter's rank transformation, Burnett and Barr's rank difference scores, and Shirley's general linear model solution. The results of simulation studies regarding Type I…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods
Porter, Andrew C.; McSweeney, Maryellen – 1974
A Monte Carlo technique was used to investigate the small sample goodness of fit and statistical power of several nonparametric tests and their parametric analogues when applied to data which violate parametric assumptions. The motivation was to facilitate choice among three designs, simple random assignment with and without a concomitant variable…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit