NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Michael D.; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan – Psychological Review, 2005
D. Trafimow presented an analysis of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) using Bayes's theorem. Among other points, he concluded that NHST is logically invalid, but that logically valid Bayesian analyses are often not possible. The latter conclusion reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of Bayesian inference. This view…
Descriptors: Psychology, Statistical Inference, Statistical Significance, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Finch, Sue; Cumming, Geoff; Thomason, Neil – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Analyzed 150 articles from the "Journal of Applied Psychology" (JAP) from 1940 to 1999 to determine statistical reporting practices related to null hypothesis significance testing, American Psychological Association guidelines, and reform recommendations. Findings show little evidence that decades of cogent criticisms by reformers have…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Psychology, Research Reports, Scholarly Journals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Bruce – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Introduces the three subsequent articles from this special section, which extend the discussion of future prospects for progress in the reporting and interpreting of effect sizes by researchers. The authors of these pieces represent diverse views. (SLD)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Psychology, Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kirk, Roger E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Makes the case that science is best served when researchers focus on the size of effects and their practical significance. Advocates the use of confidence intervals for deciding whether chance or sampling variability is an unlikely explanation for an observed effect. Calls for more emphasis on effect sizes in the next edition of the American…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Psychology, Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cumming, Geoff; Finch, Sue – American Psychologist, 2005
Wider use in psychology of confidence intervals (CIs), especially as error bars in figures, is a desirable development. However, psychologists seldom use CIs and may not understand them well. The authors discuss the interpretation of figures with error bars and analyze the relationship between CIs and statistical significance testing. They propose…
Descriptors: Research Design, Psychologists, Psychology, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Byrd, Jimmy K. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 2007
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review research published by Educational Administration Quarterly (EAQ) during the past 10 years to determine if confidence intervals and effect sizes were being reported as recommended by the American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Manual. Research Design: The author examined 49 volumes of…
Descriptors: Research Design, Intervals, Statistical Inference, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vacha-Haase, Tammi – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Researchers, journal editors, textbook authors, and those responsible for writing publication manuals must work together to enhance the thoughtful reporting of statistical results and to make clear the necessity for reporting effect sizes. (SLD)
Descriptors: Authors, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hyde, Janet Shibley – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001
Suggests that researchers should report the results of appropriate significance tests and the effect sizes associated with each test. Discusses the roles of textbook authors, publication manuals, and journal editors in leading the movement to better statistical reporting. (SLD)
Descriptors: Authors, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Psychology