Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Effect Size | 2 |
| Probability | 2 |
| Replication (Evaluation) | 2 |
| Statistics | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Problems | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychological Methods | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTrafimow, David; MacDonald, Justin A.; Rice, Stephen; Clason, Dennis L. – Psychological Methods, 2010
Largely due to dissatisfaction with the standard null hypothesis significance testing procedure, researchers have begun to consider alternatives. For example, Killeen (2005a) has argued that researchers should calculate p[subscript rep] that is purported to indicate the probability that, if the experiment in question were replicated, the obtained…
Descriptors: Probability, Replication (Evaluation), Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Serlin, Ronald C. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The sense that replicability is an important aspect of empirical science led Killeen (2005a) to define "p[subscript rep]," the probability that a replication will result in an outcome in the same direction as that found in a current experiment. Since then, several authors have praised and criticized 'p[subscript rep]," culminating…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Effect Size, Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques
