Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Discrimination Learning | 13 |
| Stimuli | 13 |
| Teaching Methods | 13 |
| Cues | 3 |
| Generalization | 3 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 3 |
| Responses | 3 |
| Children | 2 |
| Conditioning | 2 |
| Learning Theories | 2 |
| Maintenance | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Allington, Richard | 1 |
| Baine, David | 1 |
| Barnes, Clarissa S. | 1 |
| Beran, Michael J. | 1 |
| Carnine, Douglas | 1 |
| Carr, James E. | 1 |
| Chan, Betty | 1 |
| Evans, Theodore A. | 1 |
| Flemming, Timothy M. | 1 |
| Gersten, Russel M. | 1 |
| Grow, Laura L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 8 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Grow, Laura L.; Kodak, Tiffany; Carr, James E. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2014
Previous research has demonstrated that the conditional-only method (starting with a multiple-stimulus array) is more efficient than the simple-conditional method (progressive incorporation of more stimuli into the array) for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders (Grow, Carr, Kodak, Jostad, & Kisamore, 2011).…
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Teaching Methods, Receptive Language
Barnes, Clarissa S. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
This investigation evaluated the use of conditional discrimination (CD) instruction and multiple exemplar instruction (MEI) to establish derived relational responding in accordance with hierarchical frames with school aged children. The first experiment used a multiple probe design to evaluate the effectiveness of MEI to teach participants to…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Discrimination Learning, Behavior Modification, Children
Beran, Michael J.; Klein, Emily D.; Evans, Theodore A.; Chan, Betty; Flemming, Timothy M.; Harris, Emily H.; Washburn, David A.; Rumbaugh, Duane M. – Psychological Record, 2008
Learning styles in capuchin monkeys were assessed with a computerized reversal-learning task called the mediational paradigm. First, monkeys were trained to respond with 90% accuracy on a two-choice discrimination (A+B-). Then the authors examined differences in performance on three different types of reversal trials (A-B+, A-C+, B+C-), each of…
Descriptors: Cues, Teaching Methods, Prediction, Animals
Baine, David; Sobsey, Dick – Canadian Journal for Exceptional Children, 1986
The steps involved in teaching multiple discrimination to disabled students are listed for ecological, performance, functional, and stimulus analyses. Additional considerations, including stimulus modification and design of the instructional sequence (successive or cumulative approaches), are reviewed. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Discrimination Learning, Stimuli, Teaching Methods
Mueller, Michael M.; Palkovic, Christine M.; Maynard, Cynthia S. – Psychology in the Schools, 2007
Errorless learning refers to a variety of discrimination learning techniques that eliminate or minimize responding to incorrect choices. This article describes experimental roots of errorless learning and applied errorless strategies. Specifically, previous research on stimulus fading, stimulus shaping, response prevention, delayed prompting,…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, School Psychologists, Discrimination Learning, Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Allington, Richard – Academic Therapy, 1975
Descriptors: Attention Span, Basic Reading, Discrimination Learning, General Education
Peer reviewedCarnine, Douglas – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
Efficiency was compared between three procedures for sequencing examples with minimal stimulus variation between adjacent positive and negative examples: dynamic, static, and static with maximal differences between pairs. For young children, increasing relevant feature saliency and altering a single stimulus to generate examples reduced training…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Learning Theories, Primary Education, Stimuli
Gersten, Russel M.; And Others – Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1982
Four studies compared static versus dynamic presentations of examples and nonexaples of the concepts "diagonal" and "conves," with nonhandicapped preschoolers, mildly handicapped primary students, and severely handicapped adults. Ss taught with a dynamic presentation learned the discrimination in significantly fewer trials, with performance either…
Descriptors: Adults, Discrimination Learning, Mild Disabilities, Primary Education
Peer reviewedSoraci, Sal A., Jr.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1987
Five preschool children at risk for mental retardation were taught to choose an odd stimulus which varied in one important dimension (e.g., form, color, or size) from other stimuli in a set. Oddity responding was shown to transfer across stimulus types, and learning was maintained for a minimum of six weeks. (Author/JW)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Generalization, High Risk Persons, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedJoyce, Bonnie G.; And Others – Education and Treatment of Children, 1993
A stimulus equivalence procedure for the acquisition of English and Spanish words was evaluated with two adolescents having head injuries. Following training on one task, subjects attained and maintained high scores on all matching-to-sample tasks. Results suggest the procedure is effective for teaching foreign language skills to head-injured…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Head Injuries, Instructional Effectiveness, Maintenance
Peer reviewedSmeets, Paul M.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1990
Two time-delay conditions for teaching complex visual discriminations to 14 normal preschoolers, 12 with mild mental retardation, and 11 with moderate mental retardation were compared. Results indicated that for all populations and stimuli, time delay of multiple dynamic distinctive-feature prompts produced learning, while time delay of the single…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedKarsh, Kathryn G.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1994
Sixteen individuals (ages 7-18) with moderate or severe mental retardation were taught to identify 2 comparative discriminations by a static or dynamic presentation procedure. No differences in percentage of unprompted correct responses were found between the two procedures in training, generalization, or maintenance. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Generalization, Instructional Effectiveness
West, Leonard J. – 1980
Teachers and teacher educators seem to be little aware of some major concepts about instruction that provide important insights into the central requirements for learning. A common misconception is that motivation has to do with wanting or desiring. It is instead attention to stimuli that is influenced by two powerful agents--(1) suspense,…
Descriptors: Achievement, Behavior Change, Behavioral Objectives, Career Education

Direct link
