Publication Date
In 2025 | 28 |
Since 2024 | 126 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 534 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2326 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5262 |
Descriptor
Structural Equation Models | 5678 |
Foreign Countries | 2785 |
Correlation | 1795 |
Questionnaires | 1175 |
Factor Analysis | 1126 |
Statistical Analysis | 1076 |
Student Attitudes | 1037 |
Predictor Variables | 966 |
Academic Achievement | 753 |
Longitudinal Studies | 682 |
College Students | 673 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 20 |
Teachers | 15 |
Practitioners | 10 |
Students | 4 |
Administrators | 3 |
Counselors | 3 |
Parents | 2 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Turkey | 267 |
Taiwan | 201 |
China | 191 |
Germany | 166 |
Australia | 145 |
Malaysia | 121 |
South Korea | 118 |
Netherlands | 116 |
Hong Kong | 110 |
Spain | 105 |
Norway | 88 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
Does not meet standards | 6 |
Roy Levy; Daniel McNeish – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2025
Research in education and behavioral sciences often involves the use of latent variable models that are related to indicators, as well as related to covariates or outcomes. Such models are subject to interpretational confounding, which occurs when fitting the model with covariates or outcomes alters the results for the measurement model. This has…
Descriptors: Models, Statistical Analysis, Measurement, Data Interpretation
Fisk, Charles L.; Harring, Jeffrey R.; Shen, Zuchao; Leite, Walter; Suen, King Yiu; Marcoulides, Katerina M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Sensitivity analyses encompass a broad set of post-analytic techniques that are characterized as measuring the potential impact of any factor that has an effect on some output variables of a model. This research focuses on the utility of the simulated annealing algorithm to automatically identify path configurations and parameter values of omitted…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Algorithms, Simulation, Evaluation Methods
Leonidas A. Zampetakis – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
In the last decade, research on the connection between curiosity and creativity has surged revealing a positive correlation. However, these findings are primarily based on cross-sectional studies, which do not establish the direction of the relationship between creativity and curiosity. Is curiosity the driving force behind creativity, or does…
Descriptors: Creativity, Personality Traits, Structural Equation Models, Foreign Countries
Marco Vassallo – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2024
Imaginary latent variables are variables with negative variances and have been used to implement constraints in measurement models. This article aimed to advance this practice and rationalize the imaginary latent variables as a method to detect possible latent deficiencies in measurement models. This rationale is based on the theory of complex…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Numbers, Mathematics, Mathematical Concepts
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Kuan-Yu Jin; Yi-Jhen Wu; Ming Ming Chiu – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2025
Many education tests and psychological surveys elicit respondent views of similar constructs across scenarios (e.g., story followed by multiple choice questions) by repeating common statements across scales (one-statement-multiple-scale, OSMS). However, a respondent's earlier responses to the common statement can affect later responses to it…
Descriptors: Administrator Surveys, Teacher Surveys, Responses, Test Items
Selcuk Acar; Emel Cevik; Emily Fesli; Rumeysa Nalan Bozkurt; James C. Kaufman – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
Domain-specificity is a topic of debate within the field of creativity. To shed light on this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of cross-domain correlations based on the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). To evaluate the model fit of one general factor versus two factors that encompass the primary K-DOCS subscales (Scholarly,…
Descriptors: Creativity, Science Education, Meta Analysis, Structural Equation Models
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2024
Compared to traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) has been shown to result in less structural parameter bias when cross-loadings (CLs) are present. However, when model fit is reasonable for CFA (over ESEM), CFA should be preferred on the basis of parsimony. Using simulations, the current…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Goodness of Fit
Philipp Sterner; Florian Pargent; Dominik Deffner; David Goretzko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance (MI) describes the equivalence of measurement models of a construct across groups or time. When comparing latent means, MI is often stated as a prerequisite of meaningful group comparisons. The most common way to investigate MI is multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA). Although numerous guides exist, a recent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Causal Models, Measurement, Predictor Variables
Kelvin T. Afolabi; Timothy R. Konold – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2024
Exploratory structural equation (ESEM) has received increased attention in the methodological literature as a promising tool for evaluating latent variable measurement models. It overcomes many of the limitations attached to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while capitalizing on the benefits of each. Given…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis
Walter P. Vispoel; Hyeryung Lee; Hyeri Hong – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
We demonstrate how to analyze complete multivariate generalizability theory (GT) designs within structural equation modeling frameworks that encompass both individual subscale scores and composites formed from those scores. Results from numerous analyses of observed scores obtained from respondents who completed the recently updated form of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multivariate Analysis, Generalizability Theory, College Students
Jinying Ouyang; Zhehan Jiang; Christine DiStefano; Junhao Pan; Yuting Han; Lingling Xu; Dexin Shi; Fen Cai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Precisely estimating factor scores is challenging, especially when models are mis-specified. Stemming from network analysis, centrality measures offer an alternative approach to estimating the scores. Using a two-fold simulation design with varying availability of a priori theoretical knowledge, this study implemented hybrid centrality to estimate…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Network Analysis, Scores
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Guangjian Zhang; Lauren A. Trichtinger; Dayoung Lee; Ge Jiang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Many applications of structural equation modeling involve ordinal (e.g., Likert) variables. A popular way of dealing with ordinal variables is to estimate the model with polychoric correlations rather than Pearson correlations. Such an estimation also requires the asymptotic covariance matrix of polychoric correlations. It is computationally…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Predictor Variables, Correlation, Computation
A. R. Georgeson – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Scores, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias