NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 29 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Benjamin Nagengast; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A two-level data set can be structured in either long format (LF) or wide format (WF), and both have corresponding SEM approaches for estimating multilevel models. Intuitively, one might expect these approaches to perform similarly. However, the two data formats yield data matrices with different numbers of columns and rows, and their "cols :…
Descriptors: Data, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Distributions, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuanfang Liu; Mark H. C. Lai; Ben Kelcey – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance holds when a latent construct is measured in the same way across different levels of background variables (continuous or categorical) while controlling for the true value of that construct. Using Monte Carlo simulation, this paper compares the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model and MIMIC-interaction to a…
Descriptors: Classification, Accuracy, Error of Measurement, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Fatih Orcan – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2023
Among all, Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega are commonly used for reliability estimations. The alpha uses inter-item correlations while omega is based on a factor analysis result. This study uses simulated ordinal data sets to test whether the alpha and omega produce different estimates. Their performances were compared according to the…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Correlation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eunsook Kim; Diep Nguyen; Siyu Liu; Yan Wang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Factor mixture modeling (FMM) is generally complex with both unobserved categorical and unobserved continuous variables. We explore the potential of item parceling to reduce the model complexity of FMM and improve convergence and class enumeration accordingly. To this end, we conduct Monte Carlo simulations with three types of data, continuous,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Chi-square tests based on maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of covariance structures often incorrectly over-reject the null hypothesis: [sigma] = [sigma(theta)] when the sample size is small. Reweighted least squares (RLS) avoids this problem. In some models, the vector of parameter must contain means, variances, and covariances, yet whether RLS…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jobst, Lisa J.; Auerswald, Max; Moshagen, Morten – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Prior studies investigating the effects of non-normality in structural equation modeling typically induced non-normality in the indicator variables. This procedure neglects the factor analytic structure of the data, which is defined as the sum of latent variables and errors, so it is unclear whether previous results hold if the source of…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis
Clark, D. Angus; Bowles, Ryan P. – Grantee Submission, 2018
In exploratory item factor analysis (IFA), researchers may use model fit statistics and commonly invoked fit thresholds to help determine the dimensionality of an assessment. However, these indices and thresholds may mislead as they were developed in a confirmatory framework for models with continuous, not categorical, indicators. The present…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Factor Structure, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Yu; Lei, Pui-Wa – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2016
Despite the prevalence of ordinal observed variables in applied structural equation modeling (SEM) research, limited attention has been given to model evaluation methods suitable for ordinal variables, thus providing practitioners in the field with few guidelines to follow. This study represents a first attempt to thoroughly examine the…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Causal Models, Least Squares Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Jian; Lomax, Richard G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2017
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this research examined the performance of four missing data methods in SEM under different multivariate distributional conditions. The effects of four independent variables (sample size, missing proportion, distribution shape, and factor loading magnitude) were investigated on six outcome variables: convergence rate,…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Yuan, Ke-Hai; Zhang, Zhiyong; Zhao, Yanyun – Grantee Submission, 2017
The normal-distribution-based likelihood ratio statistic T[subscript ml] = nF[subscript ml] is widely used for power analysis in structural Equation modeling (SEM). In such an analysis, power and sample size are computed by assuming that T[subscript ml] follows a central chi-square distribution under H[subscript 0] and a noncentral chi-square…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Structural Equation Models, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Devlieger, Ines; Mayer, Axel; Rosseel, Yves – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
In this article, an overview is given of four methods to perform factor score regression (FSR), namely regression FSR, Bartlett FSR, the bias avoiding method of Skrondal and Laake, and the bias correcting method of Croon. The bias correcting method is extended to include a reliable standard error. The four methods are compared with each other and…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolf, Erika J.; Harrington, Kelly M.; Clark, Shaunna L.; Miller, Mark W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
Determining sample size requirements for structural equation modeling (SEM) is a challenge often faced by investigators, peer reviewers, and grant writers. Recent years have seen a large increase in SEMs in the behavioral science literature, but consideration of sample size requirements for applied SEMs often relies on outdated rules-of-thumb.…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tong, Xiaoxiao; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Recently a new mean scaled and skewness adjusted test statistic was developed for evaluating structural equation models in small samples and with potentially nonnormal data, but this statistic has received only limited evaluation. The performance of this statistic is compared to normal theory maximum likelihood and 2 well-known robust test…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Robustness (Statistics), Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Voelkle, Manuel C.; Oud, Johan H. L.; von Oertzen, Timo; Lindenberger, Ulman – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
This article has 3 objectives that build on each other. First, we demonstrate how to obtain maximum likelihood estimates for dynamic factor models (the direct autoregressive factor score model) with arbitrary "T" and "N" by means of structural equation modeling (SEM) and compare the approach to existing methods. Second, we go beyond standard time…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Computation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Muthen, Bengt; Asparouhov, Tihomir – Psychological Methods, 2012
This rejoinder discusses the general comments on how to use Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) wisely and how to get more people better trained in using Bayesian methods. Responses to specific comments cover how to handle sign switching, nonconvergence and nonidentification, and prior choices in latent variable models. Two new…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2