Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Factor Structure | 3 |
Multitrait Multimethod… | 3 |
Structural Equation Models | 3 |
Factor Analysis | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Clinical Psychology | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Emotional Intelligence | 1 |
Evaluation | 1 |
Federal Legislation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Joseph, Dana L. | 1 |
Kenny, David A. | 1 |
Long, Susanne K. | 1 |
Newman, Daniel A. | 1 |
Shermis, Mark D. | 1 |
Zautra, Alex | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
Test of Standard Written… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Joseph, Dana L.; Newman, Daniel A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2010
A major stumbling block for emotional intelligence (EI) research has been the lack of adequate evidence for discriminant validity. In a sample of 280 dyads, self- and peer-reports of EI and Big Five personality traits were used to confirm an a priori four-factor model for the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) and a five-factor…
Descriptors: Emotional Intelligence, Measurement Techniques, Validity, Personality Traits
Shermis, Mark D.; Long, Susanne K. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2009
This study investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the high-stakes Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) in both reading and writing at grade levels 4, 8, and 10. The data from the 2006 FCAT administration were analyzed via traditional multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis to identify the factor structure and structural…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques, Writing Tests, Validity

Kenny, David A.; Zautra, Alex – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1995
Describes a new approach for analyzing an individual's responses made at multiple times. Proposes that three sources of variance determine a person's current standing on a variable: trait (term does not change), state (term changes), and error (random term). Shows how structural equation modeling can be used and presents an extended example. (RJM)
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Item Analysis