NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 39 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Within the frequentist structural equation modeling (SEM) framework, adjudicating model quality through measures of fit has been an active area of methodological research. Complicating this conversation is research revealing that a higher quality measurement portion of a SEM can result in poorer estimates of overall model fit than lower quality…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Reliability, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This paper aims to advocate for a balanced approach to model fit evaluation in structural equation modeling (SEM). The ongoing debate surrounding chi-square test statistics and fit indices has been characterized by ambiguity and controversy. Despite the acknowledged limitations of relying solely on the chi-square test, its careful application can…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Robustness (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Fatih Orcan – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2023
Among all, Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega are commonly used for reliability estimations. The alpha uses inter-item correlations while omega is based on a factor analysis result. This study uses simulated ordinal data sets to test whether the alpha and omega produce different estimates. Their performances were compared according to the…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Correlation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Chi-square tests based on maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of covariance structures often incorrectly over-reject the null hypothesis: [sigma] = [sigma(theta)] when the sample size is small. Reweighted least squares (RLS) avoids this problem. In some models, the vector of parameter must contain means, variances, and covariances, yet whether RLS…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Sample Size
Clark, D. Angus; Nuttall, Amy K.; Bowles, Ryan P. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2021
Hybrid autoregressive-latent growth structural equation models for longitudinal data represent a synthesis of the autoregressive and latent growth modeling frameworks. Although these models are conceptually powerful, in practice they may struggle to separate autoregressive and growth-related processes during estimation. This confounding of change…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Longitudinal Studies, Risk, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jobst, Lisa J.; Auerswald, Max; Moshagen, Morten – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Prior studies investigating the effects of non-normality in structural equation modeling typically induced non-normality in the indicator variables. This procedure neglects the factor analytic structure of the data, which is defined as the sum of latent variables and errors, so it is unclear whether previous results hold if the source of…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis
Cain, Meghan K.; Zhang, Zhiyong – Grantee Submission, 2018
Despite its importance to structural equation modeling, model evaluation remains underdeveloped in the Bayesian SEM framework. Posterior predictive p-values (PPP) and deviance information criteria (DIC) are now available in popular software for Bayesian model evaluation, but they remain under-utilized. This is largely due to the lack of…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsu, Hsien-Yuan; Lin, Jr-Hung; Kwok, Oi-Man; Acosta, Sandra; Willson, Victor – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
Several researchers have recommended that level-specific fit indices should be applied to detect the lack of model fit at any level in multilevel structural equation models. Although we concur with their view, we note that these studies did not sufficiently consider the impact of intraclass correlation (ICC) on the performance of level-specific…
Descriptors: Correlation, Goodness of Fit, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models
Clark, D. Angus; Bowles, Ryan P. – Grantee Submission, 2018
In exploratory item factor analysis (IFA), researchers may use model fit statistics and commonly invoked fit thresholds to help determine the dimensionality of an assessment. However, these indices and thresholds may mislead as they were developed in a confirmatory framework for models with continuous, not categorical, indicators. The present…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Factor Structure, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lee, Taehun; Cai, Li; Kuhfeld, Megan – Grantee Submission, 2016
Posterior Predictive Model Checking (PPMC) is a Bayesian model checking method that compares the observed data to (plausible) future observations from the posterior predictive distribution. We propose an alternative to PPMC in the context of structural equation modeling, which we term the Poor Persons PPMC (PP-PPMC), for the situation wherein one…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Prediction, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Yu; Lei, Pui-Wa – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2016
Despite the prevalence of ordinal observed variables in applied structural equation modeling (SEM) research, limited attention has been given to model evaluation methods suitable for ordinal variables, thus providing practitioners in the field with few guidelines to follow. This study represents a first attempt to thoroughly examine the…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Causal Models, Least Squares Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Jian; Lomax, Richard G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2017
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this research examined the performance of four missing data methods in SEM under different multivariate distributional conditions. The effects of four independent variables (sample size, missing proportion, distribution shape, and factor loading magnitude) were investigated on six outcome variables: convergence rate,…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maslowsky, Julie; Jager, Justin; Hemken, Douglas – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2015
Latent variables are common in psychological research. Research questions involving the interaction of two variables are likewise quite common. Methods for estimating and interpreting interactions between latent variables within a structural equation modeling framework have recently become available. The latent moderated structural equations (LMS)…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Goodness of Fit, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kenny, David A.; Kaniskan, Burcu; McCoach, D. Betsy – Sociological Methods & Research, 2015
Given that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is currently one of the most popular measures of goodness-of-model fit within structural equation modeling (SEM), it is important to know how well the RMSEA performs in models with small degrees of freedom ("df"). Unfortunately, most previous work on the RMSEA and its…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Models, Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whittaker, Tiffany A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Latent means methods such as multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) and structured means modeling (SMM) allow researchers to determine whether or not a significant difference exists between groups' factor means. Strong invariance is typically recommended when interpreting latent mean differences. The extent of the impact of noninvariant…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3