NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 171 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ismail Cuhadar; Ömür Kaya Kalkan – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Simulation studies are needed to investigate how many score categories are sufficient to treat ordered categorical data as continuous, particularly for bifactor models. The current simulation study aims to address such needs by investigating the performance of estimation methods in the bifactor models with ordered categorical data. Results support…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Structural Equation Models, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Suppanut Sriutaisuk; Yu Liu; Seungwon Chung; Hanjoe Kim; Fei Gu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
The multiple imputation two-stage (MI2S) approach holds promise for evaluating the model fit of structural equation models for ordinal variables with multiply imputed data. However, previous studies only examined the performance of MI2S-based residual-based test statistics. This study extends previous research by examining the performance of two…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Programming Languages, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip K. Wood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
The logistic and confined exponential curves are frequently used in studies of growth and learning. These models, which are nonlinear in their parameters, can be estimated using structural equation modeling software. This paper proposes a single combined model, a weighted combination of both models. Mplus, Proc Calis, and lavaan code for the model…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cox, Kyle; Kelcey, Benjamin – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Multilevel structural equation models (MSEMs) are well suited for educational research because they accommodate complex systems involving latent variables in multilevel settings. Estimation using Croon's bias-corrected factor score (BCFS) path estimation has recently been extended to MSEMs and demonstrated promise with limited sample sizes. This…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Educational Research, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xiaohui Luo; Yueqin Hu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Intensive longitudinal data has been widely used to examine reciprocal or causal relations between variables. However, these variables may not be temporally aligned. This study examined the consequences and solutions of the problem of temporal misalignment in intensive longitudinal data based on dynamic structural equation models. First the impact…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sim, Mikyung; Kim, Su-Young; Suh, Youngsuk – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Mediation models have been widely used in many disciplines to better understand the underlying processes between independent and dependent variables. Despite their popularity and importance, the appropriate sample sizes for estimating those models are not well known. Although several approaches (such as Monte Carlo methods) exist, applied…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Statistical Analysis, Predictor Variables, Path Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) allows for the estimation of all cross-loadings, which leads to the number of parameters estimated substantially greater than that in conventional SEM. This study examined the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance in ESEM. Results suggested that…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Computation, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emma Somer; Carl Falk; Milica Miocevic – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Factor Score Regression (FSR) is increasingly employed as an alternative to structural equation modeling (SEM) in small samples. Despite its popularity in psychology, the performance of FSR in multigroup models with small samples remains relatively unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the performance of FSR, namely Croon's correction and…
Descriptors: Scores, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
van Laar, Saskia; Braeken, Johan – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2021
Despite the sensitivity of fit indices to various model and data characteristics in structural equation modeling, these fit indices are used in a rigid binary fashion as a mere rule of thumb threshold value in a search for model adequacy. Here, we address the behavior and interpretation of the popular Comparative Fit Index (CFI) by stressing that…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Sampling, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Son, Sookyoung; Hong, Sehee – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
The purpose of this two-part study is to evaluate methods for multiple group analysis when the comparison group is at the within level with multilevel data, using a multilevel factor mixture model (ML FMM) and a multilevel multiple-indicators multiple-causes (ML MIMIC) model. The performance of these methods was evaluated integrally by a series of…
Descriptors: Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fu, Yuanshu; Wen, Zhonglin; Wang, Yang – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Composite reliability, or coefficient omega, can be estimated using structural equation modeling. Composite reliability is usually estimated under the basic independent clusters model of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA). However, due to the existence of cross-loadings, the model fit of the exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Reliability
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12