Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Cognitive Science | 3 |
Author
Ambridge, Ben | 1 |
Demestre, Josep | 1 |
Garcia-Albea, Jose E. | 1 |
Pine, Julian M. | 1 |
Rowland, Caroline F. | 1 |
Stabler, Edward P. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ambridge, Ben; Rowland, Caroline F.; Pine, Julian M. – Cognitive Science, 2008
According to Crain and Nakayama (1987), when forming complex yes/no questions, children do not make errors such as "Is the boy who smoking is crazy?" because they have innate knowledge of "structure dependence" and so will not move the auxiliary from the relative clause. However, simple recurrent networks are also able to avoid…
Descriptors: Children, Language Processing, Language Patterns, Linguistic Input
Demestre, Josep; Garcia-Albea, Jose E. – Cognitive Science, 2007
Event-related brain potentials were recorded while subjects listened to sentences containing a controlled infinitival complement. Subject and object control items were used, both with 2 potential antecedents in the upper clause. Half of the sentences had a gender agreement violation between the null subject of the infinitival complement and an…
Descriptors: Form Classes (Languages), Neurolinguistics, Language Processing, Error Analysis (Language)
Stabler, Edward P. – Cognitive Science, 2004
Four different kinds of grammars that can define crossing dependencies in human language are compared here: (1) "context sensitive rewrite" grammars with rules that depend on context; (2) "matching" grammars with constraints that filter the generative structure of the language; (3) "copying" grammars which can copy structures of unbounded size;…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Sentence Structure, Context Effect, Generative Grammar