NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 35 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardner, Thomas J. – Linguistics, 1973
Consideration of the grammatical connections which might exist between certain structural types of substantival metaphors, e.g., You're a (greedy) pig!'' and You're as greedy as a pig!'' (RS)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Generative Grammar, Metaphors
Reider, Michael – Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 1996
This paper presents an alternative analysis of tough constructions for N. Chomsky's 1981 wh-movement analysis of tough constructions. To replace Chomsky's solution and to obviate the need for generalized transformations in Government-Binding (GB) theory, an alternative analysis is proposed in which the tough subject originates as an embedded…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Linguistic Theory, Sentence Structure, Structural Analysis (Linguistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Chungmin – Language Sciences, 1973
Why Not V?'' refers to the grammatical structure Why Not (plus) Verb?'' (RS)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Sentence Structure, Structural Grammar
Anderson, John – Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 1974
Quantifiers are discussed and evidence presented for their existential character in some cases. Their relation to surface and underlying structure is discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Form Classes (Languages), Linguistic Theory, Nouns
Schiwy, Gunther – Linguistik und Didaktik, 1970
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Linguistic Theory, Sentence Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zabrocki, Tadeusz – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1973
A deep structure underlying sentences with modal adverbs and verbs in English is discussed. Semantic and syntactic similarities are pointed out in support of a suggestion that both surface structures have a common deep structure source. Possible ways of dealing with modality in a generative grammar are presented. (Available from: See FL 508 214.)…
Descriptors: Adverbs, Deep Structure, English, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arutjunova, N. D. – Linguistics, 1974
Defines the difference between lexical and propositive nomination, and examines their interrelation. Clarification of syntactic problems allowed for by distinguishing nominative and communicative aspects of a sentence is discussed, and the relationship of semantic syntax to traditional syntactic theory is also discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Nouns
van Oosten, Jeanne – 1977
Criteria for defining individual members of the preposition word class are set forth. Arguments are presented against calling prepositions meaningless, yet it is conceded and explained that those which occur in wider contexts are vaguer due to their greater variability. The unitary, polysemous, and/or homonymous nature of prepositions are…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Definitions, Form Classes (Languages), Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Polanski, Kazimierz – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1972
An argument is made for a theory of deep structure which does not neglect surface structure analysis. See FL 508 197 for availability. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gasparov, B. M. – Linguistics, 1974
The problem of determining the grammatical correctness, as opposed to semantic correctness, of the output of a generative system is discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Semantics
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Aissen, Judith L. – 1984
This study investigates whether other relationships in sentence structure besides the "brother-in-law" relation sanction surrogate agreement in Zinacanteco Tzotzil (Mayan). Surrogate agreement refers to cases in which an element that lies outside the class of regular agreement controllers in a language (the surrogate) controls…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Form Classes (Languages), Language Research, Sentence Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bergen, John J. – Hispania, 1978
This article presents recent representative structural, eclectic, transformational, and semantic analyses of the subjunctive. A different theory is presented that states that there is but a single common rule for the use of the subjunctive and the indicative in all of their occurrences, both in independent and main clauses. (Author/NCR)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Morphology (Languages)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kroch, Anthony S.; Marshall, Byron – International Journal of American Linguistics, 1973
Descriptors: American Indian Languages, Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Papago
Cherubim, Dieter; And Others – Deutsche Sprache, 1973
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory, Sentence Diagraming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cornelis, Louise – Language Sciences, 1996
Investigates the differences in form and meaning between the Dutch and English passives, attributing the differences to the passive auxiliaries that signal a process and a state for Dutch and English. The article is aided by the framework of Langacker's (1991) cognitive grammar. (30 references) (Author/CK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Contrastive Linguistics, Deep Structure, Dutch
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3