NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Flanigan, Abraham E.; Peteranetz, Markeya S.; Shell, Duane F.; Soh, Leen-Kiat – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2022
Two studies investigated change in computer science (CS) students' implicit intelligence beliefs. Across both studies, we found that the strength of incremental and entity beliefs changed across time. In Study 1, we found that incremental beliefs decreased and entity beliefs increased across the semester. Change in implicit intelligence beliefs…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Computer Science Education, Student Attitudes, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peteranetz, Markeya S.; Flanigan, Abraham E.; Shell, Duane F.; Soh, Leen-Kiat – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2018
Contribution: This paper provides evidence that computational creativity exercises (CCEs) can increase engineering students' learning in introductory computer science (CS1) courses. Its main contribution is its more rigorous treatment/control group research design that allows testing for causal influences of CCEs on student learning and…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Evidence Based Practice, Problem Solving, Control Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nelson, Katherine G.; Shell, Duane F.; Husman, Jenefer; Fishman, Evan J.; Soh, Leen-Kiat – Journal of Engineering Education, 2015
Background: Technical, nonengineering required courses taken at the onset of an engineering degree provide students a foundation for engineering coursework. Students who perform poorly in these foundational courses, even in those tailored to engineering, typically have limited success in engineering. A profile approach may explain why these…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Engineering Education, Profiles, Barriers
Shell, Duane F.; And Others – 1986
The We Do--They Do Model provides an evaluation methodology that service providers can use on a small scale to obtain data for themselves and for the over-all system. The model allows for complete assessment of ongoing program implementation and outcome. Three questions are used to organize evaluation activities: (1) Did staff (We) do what we said…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Computer Science Education, Disabilities, Educational Objectives