NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hao, Qiang; Smith, David H., IV; Ding, Lu; Ko, Amy; Ottaway, Camille; Wilson, Jack; Arakawa, Kai H.; Turcan, Alistair; Poehlman, Timothy; Greer, Tyler – Computer Science Education, 2022
Background and Context: automated feedback for programming assignments has great potential in promoting just-in-time learning, but there has been little work investigating the design of feedback in this context. Objective: to investigate the impacts of different designs of automated feedback on student learning at a fine-grained level, and how…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Worsley, Marcelo; Bar-El, David – Computer Science Education, 2022
Background and Context: Making is celebrated for bringing exciting tools and learning opportunities to non-traditional designers. However, people with disabilities may find themselves excluded from many making activities and makerspaces. This exclusion is present in making and computer science more broadly. Objective: We describe a university…
Descriptors: Inclusion, Students with Disabilities, College Students, Shared Resources and Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moskal, Adon Christian Michael; Wass, Rob – Computer Science Education, 2019
Background and Context: Encouraging undergraduate programming students to think more about their software development processes is challenging. Most programming courses focus on coding skill development and mastering programming language features; subsequently software development processes (e.g. planning, code commenting, and error debugging) are…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Undergraduate Students, Programming, Programming Languages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kinnunen, Paivi; Simon, Beth – Computer Science Education, 2012
This article provides insight into how computing majors experience the process of doing programming assignments in their first programming course. This grounded theory study sheds light on the various processes and contexts through which students constantly assess their self-efficacy as a programmer. The data consists of a series of four…
Descriptors: Grounded Theory, Majors (Students), Assignments, Self Efficacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cummins, Stephen; Burd, Liz; Hatch, Andrew – Computer Science Education, 2011
This article presents an investigation into the usage of shareable feedback tags as a way of delivering feedback to three different cohorts of programming students. A series of research questions are examined; these include investigating any perceived benefit from students using feedback tags and exploring how students interact with their…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Programming, Investigations, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolfe, Joanna – Computer Science Education, 2004
Despite the multiple potential benefits of asking students working on programming tasks to consider human factors, most programming assignments narrowly focus on technical details and requirements. Female students in particular may be attracted to assignments that emphasize human as well as technical factors. To assess how students respond to…
Descriptors: Assignments, Human Factors Engineering, Programming, Rhetoric