NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pinsoneault, Terry B. – Computers in Human Behavior, 1996
Computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil-administered formats for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories were investigated. Subjects were 32 master's and doctoral-level counseling students. Findings indicated that the two formats were comparable and that students preferred the computer-assisted format. (AEF)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Graduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shermis, Mark D.; Lombard, Danielle – Computers in Human Behavior, 1998
Examines the degree to which computer and test anxiety have a predictive role in performance across three computer-administered placement tests. Subjects (72 undergraduate students) were measured with the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, the Test Anxiety Inventory, and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Results suggest that much of what is considered…
Descriptors: Computer Anxiety, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Attitudes, Computer Literacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lukin, Mark E.; And Others – Computers in Human Behavior, 1985
This study utilized a Latin Squares design to assess equivalence of computer and paper-and-pencil testing methods in a clinical setting with college students. No significant differences between scores on measures of anxiety, depression, and psychological reactance were found across group and administration format. Most subjects preferred…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Literature Reviews