Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Student Attitudes | 3 |
Preferences | 2 |
Reinforcement | 2 |
Scheduling | 2 |
Time on Task | 2 |
Autism | 1 |
Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
Contingency Management | 1 |
Elementary School Students | 1 |
Feedback | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior… | 3 |
Author
Ardoin, Scott P. | 1 |
Bukala, Magdalena | 1 |
Crosbie, John | 1 |
Fienup, Daniel M. | 1 |
Hu, Meng Yao | 1 |
Kelly, Glenn | 1 |
Lee, Ronald | 1 |
Mellott, Joshua A. | 1 |
Ward-Horner, John C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mellott, Joshua A.; Ardoin, Scott P. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2023
Duration schedules of reinforcement for continuous behavior abide by several preexisting operant behavioral economic equations for reinforcer cost, otherwise known as price, and consumption. Duration schedules require behaviors to occur for a set duration of time prior to accessing reinforcement, unlike interval schedules that produce…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Preferences, Student Attitudes, Scheduling
Bukala, Magdalena; Hu, Meng Yao; Lee, Ronald; Ward-Horner, John C.; Fienup, Daniel M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2015
This study investigated performance under and preference for continuous and discontinuous work-reinforcer schedules in 3 students who had been diagnosed with autism. Under continuous schedules, participants completed all work and consumed all reinforcers in contiguous units. Under discontinuous schedules, work and reinforcer access were broken up…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Autism, Performance

Crosbie, John; Kelly, Glenn – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994
Four college students completed programmed instruction in a computerized format with either no delay between questions, a noncontingent delay, or a contingent delay (delay after each question answered incorrectly). Noncontingent delay produced better performance than no delay and contingent delay, because students used delay periods to study.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Contingency Management, Feedback, Higher Education