Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Learning Theories | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Nuclear Physics | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Teaching Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement:… | 1 |
Author
| Kyngdon, Andrew | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKyngdon, Andrew – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2011
Black, Wilson, and Yao (this issue) commendably attempt to put descriptive theory at the center of pedagogy, assessment, and curriculum. The thrust of their article is that only through theories of learning will student progression be properly understood. Casting a critical eye over the faddish distinction between "formative" and "summative"…
Descriptors: Learning Theories, Nuclear Physics, Psychometrics, Misconceptions
