Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
College Faculty | 2 |
Communication Strategies | 2 |
Credibility | 2 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Classroom Communication | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Communications | 1 |
Computer Mediated… | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Essays | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Communication Education | 2 |
Author
Banks, Jaime | 1 |
Bowman, Nicholas D. | 1 |
Clark-Gordon, Cathlin V. | 1 |
Hess, Jon A. | 1 |
Kerssen-Griep, Jeff | 1 |
Knight, Jennifer M. | 1 |
Trees, April R. | 1 |
Watts, Evan R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clark-Gordon, Cathlin V.; Bowman, Nicholas D.; Watts, Evan R.; Banks, Jaime; Knight, Jennifer M. – Communication Education, 2018
Research has established that students often consider the delivery of instructor feedback to be a face-threatening event. To minimize the potential negative effects of feedback, verbal and nonverbal face-threat mitigation (FTM) strategies are utilized by instructors. Advances in digital feedback systems, like online documents and learning…
Descriptors: Cues, Nonverbal Communication, Teacher Student Relationship, Feedback (Response)
Trees, April R.; Kerssen-Griep, Jeff; Hess, Jon A. – Communication Education, 2009
Successfully evaluating students' work challenges teachers to achieve both corrective task and identity-protection goals in interaction. This study investigated how face-threat mitigation that students received from their teachers during feedback influenced students' judgments about the quality and usefulness of the feedback their instructors…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students, College Faculty