Descriptor
Learning Disabilities | 3 |
Student Attitudes | 3 |
Teaching Models | 3 |
Delivery Systems | 2 |
Inclusive Schools | 2 |
Mainstreaming | 2 |
Teacher Collaboration | 2 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
Cooperative Learning | 1 |
Developmental Continuity | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Cohen, Patricia | 1 |
Forgan, James W. | 1 |
Gerber, Paul J. | 1 |
Klingner, Janette Kettmann | 1 |
Popp, Patricia A. | 1 |
Schumm, Jeanne Shay | 1 |
Vaughn, Sharon | 1 |
Xin, Fu | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Klingner, Janette Kettmann; Vaughn, Sharon; Schumm, Jeanne Shay; Cohen, Patricia; Forgan, James W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
Thirty-two students with and without learning disabilities who had participated in both inclusion and pull-out service delivery models were interviewed individually. Overall, more children preferred the pull-out model, but many children were confident that inclusion was meeting their academic and social needs. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Inclusive Schools, Intermediate Grades, Interviews

Gerber, Paul J.; Popp, Patricia A. – Remedial and Special Education, 1999
This study used focus groups to examine the perspectives of students with and without learning disabilities and their parents regarding collaborative teaching. Both students and parents expressed high levels of satisfaction with the model. Concerns included poor communication regarding the model to parents, the need to ensure alternative models…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Developmental Continuity, Elementary Secondary Education, Focus Groups
Xin, Fu; And Others – 1996
This study used a computer-assisted cooperative learning approach to teach mathematics to 20 third-grade students, of whom 4 were classified as learning disabled. The team-assisted individualization (TAI) model was used to heterogeneously group students for instruction into four-student teams. Within teams, students were paired. Each team worked…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Computer Assisted Instruction, Cooperative Learning, Grade 3