NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Ronald; Sturmey, Peter – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2006
Effects of a Lag 1 reinforcement schedule on appropriate and varied responding to the social question, "What do you like to do?" and effects of the proportion of preferred stimuli present during training on the amount of varied responding in each session were investigated with students with autism. An ABAB reversal design and a multielement design…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Stimuli, Autism, Behavior Modification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Turcotte, Shelly J. C.; Leventhal, Les – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
This study investigated the effect of student rating instructions on primacy and recency effects when rank ordering four lecture quality sequences. Effects were measured on final instructor ratings, liking for the instructor, student affect, and student self-esteem. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Primacy Effect
Denver Univ., CO. – 1969
To determine the effect of videotape self-confrontation as a training device for speech clinicians, 30 students participated in a 12 month study. Ten experimental subjects were assigned to single confrontation, 10 to double confrontation, and 10 were control subjects. Each confrontation subject used a therapy matrix and scored his therapy session…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Evaluation Methods, Exceptional Child Research, Feedback
Butler, F. Coit – 1971
A new Formative Evaluation Test on Bloom's paper "Learning for Mastery" is presented. The self-instructional quiz has the principles of mastery learning in it, features instant knowledge of results coupled with prescriptive feedback, and has a non-punitive student self-scoring and item-of-difficulty identification system. It should be an…
Descriptors: Autoinstructional Aids, Educational Objectives, Educational Philosophy, Evaluation Methods
Brady, Peter J.; And Others – 1975
Seventy-eight fourth grade children were randomly assigned to one of two evaluation groups. One group (self-evaluation) judged the correctness of their answers and reinforced themselves while the other group (other-evaluation) was judged and reinforced by some other person. Results showed that girls were significantly more responsible for failure…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Anxiety, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods