NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Fendler, Richard J.; Yates, Michael C.; Godbey, Jonathan M. – Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2023
This research utilizes a unique, validated, multiple-choice exam design that allows researchers to observe and measure the degree to which students copy answers from their peers. Using data collected from the exam, this study investigates whether asking students to sign an honor code at the start of the exam reduced instances of cheating relative…
Descriptors: Cheating, Prevention, Multiple Choice Tests, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Fendler, Richard J.; Yates, Michael C.; Godbey, Johnathan M. – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2018
This research introduces a unique multiple choice exam design to observe and measure the degree to which students copy answers from their peers. Using data collected from the exam, an empirical experiment is conducted to determine whether random seat assignment deters cheating relative to a control group of students allowed to choose their seats.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, College Students, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harrp, David N. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2018
Copying adjacent answer sheets on the oft-used multiple-choice exams can be prevented if exam material is scrambled. The latter mode has been a requirement for all exams of this type at McGill University for 26 years. Cheating by copying has been reduced to nearly zero in this time. The experiment carried out used permissive seating and a single…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Chemistry, College Science, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fendler, Richard J.; Godbey, Jonathan M. – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2016
Numerous academic studies and reports indicate that as many as half of all students cheat on exams. Cheating on exams undermines the central purpose of a university, corrupts the meaning of grades as a measure of subject matter mastery, and significantly harms honest students. Although instructors are aware that many students cheat and they…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Student Behavior, Teacher Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chuang, Chia Yuan; Craig, Scotty D.; Femiani, John – Higher Education Research and Development, 2017
This study investigated the ability of test takers' behaviors during online assessments to detect probable cheating incidents. Specifically, this study focused on the role of time delay and head pose for detection of cheating incidences in a lab-based online testing session. The analysis of a test taker's behavior indicated that not only time…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Computer Assisted Testing, Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sundermann, Michael J. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2008
A statistical analysis of multiple-choice answers is performed to identify anomalies that can be used as evidence of student cheating. The ratio of exact errors in common (EEIC: two students put the same wrong answer for a question) to differences (D: two students get different answers) was found to be a good indicator of cheating under a wide…
Descriptors: College Students, Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nathanson, Craig; Paulhus, Delroy L.; Williams, Kevin M. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2006
Although many studies have examined individual difference predictors of cheating, insufficient attention has been given to several important personality variables (the Big Five, perfectionism, and subclinical psychopathy). Moreover, insufficient use has been made of concrete indicators of naturalistic scholastic cheating. Using a computer-based…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Prior Learning, Personality Measures, Personality Traits