Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 8 |
| Student Behavior | 8 |
| Testing Problems | 8 |
| Higher Education | 5 |
| College Students | 4 |
| Student Attitudes | 3 |
| Teacher Behavior | 3 |
| Testing | 3 |
| Access to Information | 2 |
| Accountability | 2 |
| Administrator Behavior | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education Policy Research Unit | 2 |
| American Educational Research… | 1 |
| Change | 1 |
| Education Sciences | 1 |
| Research in Higher Education | 1 |
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
| Universal Journal of… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Georgia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bengtsson, Lars – Education Sciences, 2019
This work describes a systematic review of the research on take-home exams in tertiary education. It was found that there is some disagreement in the community about the virtues of take-home exams but also a lot of agreement. It is concluded that take-home exams may be the preferred choice of assessment method on the higher taxonomy levels because…
Descriptors: Testing Problems, Cheating, Thinking Skills, Supervision
Khalid, Adeel – Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2015
Academic misconduct by students in higher education is a fact and is a challenge to the integrity of higher education and its reputation. Furthermore such misconduct is counterproductive to the ethics component of higher education. The purpose of this research is to explore, investigate and compile the anecdotal accounts of academic misconduct…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Student Attitudes, Interdisciplinary Approach, Cheating
Peer reviewedSherrill, David; And Others – American Educational Research Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Perception, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewedMcCabe, Donald L.; Trevino, Linda Klebe – Change, 1996
Although there are new forms of cheating among college students, particularly technology-related, overall cheating has increased only modestly. Significant increases in test cheating are occurring among women and in unpermitted collaboration among students on written work. Also, students report engaging in a wider variety of test-cheating…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cheating, College Instruction, College Students
Peer reviewedBellezza, Francis S.; Bellezza, Suzanne R. – Teaching of Psychology, 1995
Reviews research on detection of cheating by students on multiple choice tests. Discusses three ideas concerning detecting, deterring, and confronting cheating. Discusses problems confronting teachers attempting to use statistical data to prove cheating. (CFR)
Descriptors: Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Student Behavior
The Inevitable Corruption of Indicators and Educators through High-Stakes Testing. Executive Summary
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators
Peer reviewedGenereux, Randy L.; McLeod, Beverly A. – Research in Higher Education, 1995
A survey of 365 college students identified circumstances likely to increase both planned and spontaneous cheating behavior, those likely to discourage both kinds of cheating, factors underlying planned cheating, most common types of cheating, and student demographic characteristics associated with greater cheating behavior. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Behavior Patterns, Behavior Standards, Cheating


