Descriptor
Accountability | 4 |
Cooperative Learning | 4 |
Criteria | 4 |
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Group Activities | 4 |
Group Membership | 4 |
Reliability | 4 |
Student Evaluation | 4 |
Student Participation | 4 |
Validity | 4 |
Adult Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bastick, Tony | 4 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bastick, Tony – 1999
The purpose of this paper is to report a successful technique for assessing cooperative group work reliably and validly. The paper demonstrates a simple-to-use assessment procedure that tracks individual accountability, energizes student interaction, and rewards cooperative learning, even as it uses fewer administrative resources than traditional…
Descriptors: Accountability, Cooperative Learning, Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Bastick, Tony – 1999
This paper aims to make the techniques of cooperative learning more attractive to teachers by presenting a method of assessment that avoids the drawbacks associated with trying to extract valid and reliable individual marks from cooperative performances. The paper presents an easy-to-use method of assessing an individual's contribution to a…
Descriptors: Accountability, Cooperative Learning, Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Bastick, Tony – 1999
Continuing education students are usually mature students who have a wealth of experience from which their peers and the lecturer could profit. An effective teaching method with such students is the use of cooperative work assignments, but a problem that prevents lecturers from using this method is the difficulty of assigning grades to individual…
Descriptors: Accountability, Adult Students, Continuing Education, Cooperative Learning
Bastick, Tony – 1999
A method for measuring the contribution an individual makes to group work is described, and its use is supported through a study of 57 university students aged from 20 to 46 years working in 8 groups of 4 to 10 members each. The method recognizes that the most valid sources of information on the contribution of each individual to the group work…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Students, Cooperative Learning, Criteria