Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Screening Tests | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Talent Identification | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
Source
| Gifted Child Today | 1 |
Author
| D. Betsy McCoach | 1 |
| Kiana R. Johnson | 1 |
| Lindsay Ellis Lee | 1 |
| Matthew C. Makel | 1 |
| Matthew T. McBee | 1 |
| Scott J. Peters | 1 |
| Tamra Stambaugh | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkScott J. Peters; Matthew C. Makel; Lindsay Ellis Lee; Tamra Stambaugh; Matthew T. McBee; D. Betsy McCoach; Kiana R. Johnson – Gifted Child Today, 2024
Universal screening is one of the most-common topics and well-accepted best practices within the field of gifted and talented education. There appears to be little disagreement that universally screening all students as part of a gifted and talented identification process results in fewer missed students. But surprisingly, there is little guidance…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Talent Identification, Screening Tests, Test Validity
