Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 7 |
Student Evaluation | 7 |
Writing Evaluation | 7 |
College Students | 5 |
Feedback (Response) | 5 |
Second Language Instruction | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Formative Evaluation | 2 |
French | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
English Journal | 1 |
English for Specific Purposes | 1 |
Francais dans le Monde | 1 |
Innovations in Education and… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Information… | 1 |
Research-publishing.net | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Thailand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustin Bernardo Garagorry Guerra – Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 2025
Aim/Purpose: This article investigates the process of identifying and correcting hallucinations in ChatGPT-4's recall of student-written responses as well as its evaluation of these responses, and provision of feedback. Effective prompting is examined to enhance the pre-evaluation, evaluation, and post-evaluation stages. Background: Advanced Large…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Junifer Leal Bucol; Napattanissa Sangkawong – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
This research paper employs an exploratory framework to evaluate the potential of ChatGPT as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in Thailand. The main objective is to investigate how well ChatGPT can assess students' writing using prompts and pre-defined rubrics compared to human raters.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Teaching Methods, English (Second Language)
Patchan, Melissa M.; Schunn, Christian D.; Correnti, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Although feedback is often seen as a critical component of the learning process, many open questions about how specific feedback features contribute to the effectiveness of feedback remain--especially in regards to peer feedback of writing. Nelson and Schunn (2009) identified several important features of peer feedback in their nature of feedback…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Regression (Statistics), Student Improvement
Nancy Frey; Douglas Fisher – English Journal, 2013
The authors assert that the time that teachers spend providing feedback could better be used to focus on formative assessment systems.
Descriptors: High School Teachers, English Teachers, Language Arts, Writing Instruction
Harwood, Nigel; Austin, Liz; Macaulay, Rowena – English for Specific Purposes, 2010
Drawing on an interview-based study of the beliefs, practices, and experiences of 16 proofreaders of student writing at undergraduate and/or graduate level in a university setting, this paper focuses on the ethical concerns informants associate with the proofreading act. "Proofreading" is defined for the purposes of this research as "third-party…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Integrity, Ethics, Interviews
Thouësny, Sylvie – Research-publishing.net, 2011
In contrast to standardised assessment, dynamic assessment (DA) simultaneously combines teaching and assessment activities. The key difference between standardised and dynamic approaches lies in the fact that, in the latter, an expert is allowed to provide assistance to a novice during the assessment process. Mediation, whether in the form of…
Descriptors: French, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computational Linguistics
Mavromara, Catherine – Francais dans le Monde, 1996
Formative evaluation of language learning is recommended, using as an example a coding method for correcting errors and indicating progress made on written assignments. The technique focuses on student self-correction and has the additional advantage of helping the teacher monitor instructional needs. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Error Correction, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation