Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Learning Modules | 3 |
Scoring | 3 |
Student Evaluation | 3 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Assignments | 1 |
Audits (Verification) | 1 |
Biological Sciences | 1 |
Biomedicine | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bunch, Michael B. | 1 |
Cizek, Gregory J. | 1 |
Creese, Brian | 1 |
Hughes, Gwyneth | 1 |
Hughes, Ian | 1 |
Koons, Heather | 1 |
Smith, Holly | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hughes, Gwyneth; Smith, Holly; Creese, Brian – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
This paper considers feedback in the context of modularised programmes in higher education in the UK. It is argued that the self-contained nature of modular assessment may limit feedback dialogue between staff and students to assignment-specific issues, and may impede student progress towards holistic programme-level aims and outcomes. A feedback…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Assignments
Cizek, Gregory J.; Bunch, Michael B.; Koons, Heather – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2004
This module describes some common standard-setting procedures used to derive performance levels for achievement tests in education, licensure, and certification. Upon completing the module, readers will be able to: describe what standard setting is; understand why standard setting is necessary; recognize some of the purposes of standard setting;…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standard Setting, Academic Standards, Academic Achievement
Hughes, Ian – Bioscience Education e-Journal, 2006
An Assessment Audit is described consisting of 47 questions, each being scored 0 to 4, by the module team depending on the extent to which the audit point was satisfied. Scores of 2 or less indicated unsatisfactory provision. Audits were carried out on 14 bioscience- or medicine-based modules in 13 universities. There was great variability between…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Scoring, Teaching Methods