Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Writing Ability | 2 |
Writing Assignments | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Critical Reading | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Feedback (Response) | 1 |
Focus Groups | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Brockman, Elizabeth | 1 |
Crawford, Mary Ann | 1 |
Hawk, Brandi | 1 |
Kreth, Melinda | 1 |
Patchan, Melissa M. | 1 |
Schunn, Christian D. | 1 |
Stevens, Christopher A. | 1 |
Taylor, Marcy | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Patchan, Melissa M.; Hawk, Brandi; Stevens, Christopher A.; Schunn, Christian D. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013
The use of peer assessment to evaluate students' writing is one recommended method that makes writing assignments possible in large content classes (i.e., more than 75 students). However, many instructors and students worry about whether students of all ability levels are capable of helping their peers. We examine how ability pairing (e.g.,…
Descriptors: Ability, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Writing Assignments
Kreth, Melinda; Crawford, Mary Ann; Taylor, Marcy; Brockman, Elizabeth – Assessing Writing, 2010
We present some key findings of a four-year, two-phase writing assessment project at Central Michigan University: Phase One (2002), a survey of faculty members (n=115) and subsequent focus groups (n=14) and Phase Two (2005), an evaluation of two samples of student writing (n=635 and 632). Major findings of Phase One reported here include the…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Critical Reading, Focus Groups, Writing Tests