Descriptor
Author
Hoyt, Donald P. | 8 |
Lee, Eun-Joo | 3 |
Reed, Jeffrey G. | 2 |
Cashin, William E. | 1 |
Pallett, William H. | 1 |
Spangler, Ronald K. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hoyt, Donald P.; Lee, Eun-Joo – 2002
A revised version of the Individual Development and Educational Assessment (IDEA) form for collecting student ratings of instructional processes and outcomes has been administered since the fall of the 1998-1999 school year. Results from all implementations of the instrument from August 1998 through August 2001 are the basic data of this report. A…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Hoyt, Donald P.; Pallett, William H. – 1999
Evaluating faculty effectiveness is important in institutions of higher education. Although evaluation is inherently threatening to most faculty members, the vast majority take their assignments seriously and want to conduct them as effectively as possible. Assessing faculty performance is a complex and time-consuming process. If it is done poorly…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness

Hoyt, Donald P.; Spangler, Ronald K. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Faculty most heavily involved in research (as rated by department heads) were found to establish higher academic standards (as rated by students) than those less involved in research. In natural-mathematical sciences student ratings were positively related to research involvement; in social-behavioral were negatively related. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Behavioral Sciences, College Faculty, Educational Research

Hoyt, Donald P.; Reed, Jeffrey G. – Research in Higher Education, 1977
The relationship between salary increases and student ratings of teaching effectiveness was studied for a sample of 266 faculty members at Kansas State University. In general, there was a modest but significant correlation between ratings and percent salary increase, with correlations more pronounced in social science and humanities. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Higher Education, Rating Scales
Hoyt, Donald P.; Lee, Eun-Joo – IDEA Center, Inc., 2002
A revised version of the IDEA form for collecting student ratings of instructional processes and outcomes has been administered since the fall term of the 1998-99 school year. Results from all administrations of the device from August 1998, through August 2001, constitute the basic data of this report. A total of 122 institutions of higher…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, College Students, Rating Scales, Test Reliability
Hoyt, Donald P.; Lee, Eun-Joo – IDEA Center, Inc., 2002
Participants in the IDEA student rating system frequently ask whether or not results differ significantly among disciplines. Do disciplines emphasize different objectives? Do their students report similar levels of progress on objectives selected by the instructor? Do teaching "approaches" differ across disciplines? Do specific…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disciplines, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, College Students, Behavioral Objectives
Hoyt, Donald P.; Reed, Jeffrey G. – 1977
The relationship between salary increases and student ratings of teaching effectiveness was studied using a sample of 266 faculty members at Kansas State University. Three measures of teaching effectiveness (student progress in meeting relevant course objectives, liking the instructor, and appreciation of the field of study) and two salary…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Correlation, Departments
Hoyt, Donald P.; Cashin, William E. – 1977
The development of the IDEA system, a survey concerning teacher effectiveness at Kansas State University (KSU) is described. The system originated at KSU during the 1968-69 academic year as a means for investigating the effectiveness of teaching and for improving instruction. A discussion concerning its purpose and rationale is included. The…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, College Students, Comparative Analysis