Descriptor
Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 15 |
Higher Education | 14 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 11 |
College Faculty | 10 |
College Instruction | 7 |
Faculty Evaluation | 6 |
Foreign Countries | 5 |
Teacher Behavior | 5 |
Feedback | 4 |
Instructional Improvement | 4 |
Peer Evaluation | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Teaching… | 3 |
Research in Higher Education | 3 |
Assessment and Evaluation in… | 2 |
Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Journal of Higher Education | 1 |
Author
Murray, Harry G. | 15 |
Renaud, Robert D. | 4 |
Erdle, Stephen | 1 |
Jelley, R. Blake | 1 |
Koon, Jeff | 1 |
Newby, William G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Reports - Research | 9 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 3 |
Teachers | 3 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 2 |
North America | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Erdle, Stephen; Murray, Harry G. – Research in Higher Education, 1986
Trained observers assessed the frequency of 95 classroom teaching behaviors shown by 124 teachers in arts and humanities, the social science, and the natural science faculties. Teaching effectiveness was measured by formal end-of-term student ratings averaged over a three-year period. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Higher Education, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance

Murray, Harry G.; Renaud, Robert D. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995
Observation of 401 college teachers indicates that teachers of different academic disciplines (arts/humanities, social sciences, natural sciences/mathematics) differ in the frequency of specific classroom teaching behaviors, but that what makes an effective teacher, in the perception of students, is consistent regardless of discipline.…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Educational Strategies
Renaud, Robert D.; Murray, Harry G. – Research in Higher Education, 2005
This study tested the Systematic Distortion Hypothesis by examining the factorial validity of student ratings of university teaching. Factorial validity is defined as the degree to which covariance among judged traits resembles the actual or true covariation of observable behaviors underlying these traits. Although many studies have examined the…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Test Validity, Student Attitudes, College Students
Murray, Harry G. – 1987
The view that student ratings have contributed to improvement of postsecondary teaching is assessed, based on logical argument and personal observation and research evidence from faculty surveys, field experiments, and longitudinal comparisons. Surveys of faculty attitudes indicate generally positive views on the impact of student ratings on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Quality, Feedback

Koon, Jeff; Murray, Harry G. – Journal of Higher Education, 1995
A study of the validity of student ratings of college faculty focused on the relationship of student outcomes to faculty ratings. Subjects were students of 36 full-time instructors; outcome measures included subject matter knowledge, student self-ratings, and measures of short- and long-term motivation (interest in the subject matter). Results…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Outcomes Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Renaud, Robert D.; Murray, Harry G. – Research in Higher Education, 1996
A study investigated the extent to which personality traits associated with teaching effectiveness changed with aging, mediating the relationship between age and teaching. Peer ratings of 29 personality traits and student evaluations of teaching for 33 full-time psychology faculty, ages 33-64, were examined. Teaching effectiveness was found to be…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Higher Education

Murray, Harry G. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1984
Recent research on formative and summative evaluation concluded that: (1) student ratings are most common and increasing in popularity; (2) student ratings are reliable; (3) evaluations influence salary, tenure, and promotion; (4) evaluations improve teaching effectiveness; (5) faculty satisfaction varies with institutional context; and (6)…
Descriptors: Attitudes, College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation

Murray, Harry G. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
Trained observers visited classrooms taught by university lecturers receiving either low, medium, or high student ratings. The observers estimated the frequency of occurrence of 60 specific, low-inference teaching behaviors. Significant differences were found for 26 individual behaviors. Three factors (clarity, enthusiasm, and rapport) differed…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Classroom Observation Techniques, College Instruction, Higher Education
Murray, Harry G.; Jelley, R. Blake; Renaud, Robert D. – 1996
This study examined effects of student evaluation of faculty teaching for 7 departments in the Faculty of Social Science at the University of Western Ontario over a 21-year period. The sample of teachers included 1322 faculty members who had taught undergraduate courses in one or more year between 1973-74 through 1993-94. The same 10-item teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Trends, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation

Murray, Harry G. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1985
College teaching effectiveness, as perceived by students, can be predicted from specific, observable classroom behaviors of the instructor and can be improved through feedback and training procedures designed to modify these behaviors. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Instruction, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria

Murray, Harry G.; Newby, William G. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1982
A survey of faculty attitudes shows that, although the existing evaluation system--including peer, graduate student, and undergraduate student assessments--is perceived as narrow in focus, ineffective in improving teaching, and inflexible, faculty are optimistic that a satisfactory system is possible. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Murray, Harry G. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Formative evaluation of teaching is discussed, and ways of obtaining diagnostic feedback that will lead to improved teaching in large lecture classes are examined. A Teacher Behaviors Inventory is included. (MLW)
Descriptors: Class Size, College Instruction, College Students, Faculty Evaluation

Murray, Harry G.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990
Relationships between colleague ratings of 29 personality traits and student ratings of teacher effectiveness were studied for 46 faculty members in 6 types of courses ranging from freshman lectures to graduate seminars in a Canadian university's psychology department. Teachers are differentially suited to different course levels because of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Courses, Foreign Countries, Graduate Study
Murray, Harry G. – 1982
The effect of student evaluations of teaching on administrative personnel decisions at the Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, was investigated. In addition, the apparent impact of summative student evaluation of teaching upon faculty attitudes and faculty teaching performance was assessed. In the Department of Psychology,…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Departments, Evaluation Criteria
Murray, Harry G. – 1979
The percentage of universities using student ratings to evaluate teacher performance is steadily increasing, but this method can be abused if it is the sole criterion of evaluation. Recent surveys of faculty attitudes towards teaching evaluation indicate that most faculty members are in favor of systematic evaluation, prefer student ratings to…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation