Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
American Journal on Mental… | 1 |
B. C. Journal of Special… | 1 |
Journal of Learning… | 1 |
Preventing School Failure | 1 |
School Psychology Review | 1 |
Special Services in the… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 3 |
Cognitive Assessment System | 1 |
Kaufman Brief Intelligence… | 1 |
Vineland Adaptive Behavior… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Barrio, Brenda L.; Ferguson, Sarah L.; Hovey, Kate A.; Boedeker, Peter; Kluttz-Drye, Benita – Preventing School Failure, 2023
Researchers in the field of special education has voiced concerns about the disproportionality of diverse students identified for special education services for decades. However, most of the recent research has focused on showing this issue using quantitative data. The voices beyond the numbers are imperative in better understanding this decades…
Descriptors: Special Education, Student Diversity, Disproportionate Representation, Minority Group Students

Chin, Christopher E.; Ledesma, Heloise Marie L.; Cirino, Paul T.; Sevcik, Rose A.; Morris, Robin D.; Frijters, Jan C.; Lovett, Maureen W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was evaluated. Both measures were administered to 65 children (ages 6-7). Results suggest caution against using the K-BIT exclusively for placement and diagnostic purposes with young children with reading…
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Primary Education

Gerry, David C.; And Others – School Psychology Review, 1984
Two groups (learning disabled and normal) of 15 children were administered the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery-Children's Revision and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Considering abnormal or borderline profiles as indicative of learning disability was 93.3 percent accurate in discriminating between groups.…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Naglieri, Jack A.; Rojahn, Johannes – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 2001
Comparison of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Third Edition) and the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) with 78 special education students found that the WISC-III identified more children, especially more black children, as having mental retardation. Results imply that the problem of disproportionate identification of black children…
Descriptors: Black Students, Disability Identification, Disproportionate Representation, Elementary Secondary Education

Ronka, Carol S.; Barnett, David – Special Services in the Schools, 1986
A study examined teachers' and parents' ratings of 39 developmentally handicapped (DH) and 9 learning disabled children on the revised Vineland and the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale. Teachers rated children eligible for DH placement more frequently than parents. The adaptive behavior ratings of the two instruments differed significantly. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Adaptive Behavior (of Disabled), Behavior Rating Scales, Developmental Disabilities, Disability Identification
Strelnieks, Maija; Wessel, Joan – 1993
This study investigated the procedures used by psychologists in a large midwestern urban area for the initial diagnosis and placement of elementary children with severe emotional disturbance (SED) in educational programs in light of the widespread criticism of the use of projective tests due to the questionable reliability of the tests and…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Rating Scales, Clinical Diagnosis, Decision Making
McGuigan, Corrine A. – B. C. Journal of Special Education, 1982
Philosophical, technical, and practical considerations in selecting and evaluating educational tests for exceptional children are discussed. The following major technical considerations are addressed: validity, reliability, sensitivity, appropriateness, objectivity, and feasibility. (SEW)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis
de la Cruz, Rey E. – 1996
This paper reviews the literature on assessment bias issues in special education. While assessment instruments yielding a single IQ score are seen as useful components in a comprehensive multifactored assessment, and are the primary tool of diagnosis for mental retardation, they are found to be irrelevant when applied to students with learning…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Court Litigation, Culture Fair Tests, Disabilities
Morison, Patricia, Ed.; And Others – 1996
This report synthesizes the key themes and ideas discussed at two 1-day workshops addressing issues in the use of IQ tests in special education evaluation and placement. The first section considers the background and legal context of the issue. The next section looks at IQ tests in school settings. Key ideas raised include the importance of never…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Court Litigation, Curriculum Based Assessment, Decision Making