Descriptor
| Due Process | 39 |
| Student Responsibility | 39 |
| Student Rights | 35 |
| Court Litigation | 21 |
| School Law | 13 |
| Student School Relationship | 13 |
| Discipline Policy | 11 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 11 |
| Freedom of Speech | 9 |
| Search and Seizure | 9 |
| Discipline | 8 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Anchondo, Jose Jorge | 2 |
| Alberti, Charles E. | 1 |
| Beckham, Joseph C. | 1 |
| Brooks, James H. | 1 |
| Clowes, Darrel A. | 1 |
| Dolce, Carl J. | 1 |
| Fischer, Louis | 1 |
| Flygare, Thomas J. | 1 |
| Graul, Donald | 1 |
| Hillman, Larry W. | 1 |
| James, Bernard | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Administrators | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Bethel School District 403 v… | 1 |
| Education Amendments 1972 | 1 |
| First Amendment | 1 |
| Fourth Amendment | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Title IX Education Amendments… | 1 |
| United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Partridge, Arthur R. – Colorado Journal of Educational Research, 1976
The author feels that school boards and administrators do have the power to govern their school systems provided they recognize that students have constitutionally guaranteed rights--(1) free expression, (2) due process, (3) privacy, (4) equality, and (5) quality education. (MB)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Due Process
McKinley, Donald R. – 1978
The suit of Peter Doe v. the San Francisco Unified School District resulted because the client was awarded a high school diploma attesting to the fact that he had satisfactorily completed all the requirements for high school graduation; however, the client was unable to read above a fifth-grade level or to adequately function in society. The court…
Descriptors: Accountability, Competency Based Education, Court Litigation, Due Process
Download full textPatterson, L. Brooks – 1976
The relationship between a school principal and the student, and the functions and responsibilities of each, are being controlled and dictated by the continuing involvement of the courts. Many complex and confusing legal questions have arisen because of this judicial intervention. Issues discussed include school violence and vandalism, student…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Lines, Patricia M. – Inequality in Education, 1971
Discusses the reason for school codes and their relationship to student rights and responsibilities. (JF)
Descriptors: Activism, Due Process, Student Responsibility, Student Rights
Beckham, Joseph C. – 1985
Cases involving public elementary and secondary education that were decided in state and federal courts from July 1984 to June 1985 are summarized in this review. The cases were selected on the basis of their relevance to contemporary problems in public schools, their definitiveness as articulations of existing law, and their reliability as guides…
Descriptors: Administrators, Boards of Education, Civil Liberties, Collective Bargaining
Peer reviewedAlberti, Charles E. – Clearing House, 1977
The enjoyment of the right of attending school is conditioned necessarily on compliance by pupils with the reasonable rules, regulations and requirements of the school authorities. Discusses the legal decisions that set the foundation for developing school discipline and responsibilities of administrators, educators, as well as school districts in…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy
Young, D. Parker – School Law Journal, 1973
Reviews recent court cases dealing with college student rights. (JF)
Descriptors: Activism, Discipline, Due Process, Higher Education
Dolce, Carl J. – 1971
This report discusses factors that lead to wide disagreement among educators about proper definitions of student rights and responsibilities. These factors include (1) the particular era in which a definition is formulated, (2) the role perspectives, (3) the values held, (4) the anticipated consequences, and (5) the implicit concepts held…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Administrators, Clothing, Court Litigation
Peer reviewedBrooks, James H. – Review of Higher Education, 1984
The legal status of college students in relationship to the institution they attend is discussed, focusing on the contractual relationship, due process, access to education, First Amendment rights, search and seizure, federal aid regulation, residency requirements for voting, and the doctrine of academic abstention in legal matters. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Education, College Students, Constitutional Law, Contracts
Johnson, Donald V. – 1973
In this speech, the author describes how one school developed discipline guidelines with the cooperation of staff, parents, and students. Due process procedures, types of discipline, and an alternative out-of-school program for adjustment students (those who have experienced chronic or serious disciplinary problems in the school) are described.…
Descriptors: Discipline, Dropout Programs, Due Process, School Policy
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1986
The Supreme Court in December 1985 voted 9-0 reversing a lower court decision in the case of "Ewing vs. Board of Regents." Ewing, a medical student, appealed the medical school's decision to dismiss him. The Supreme Court found that "the decision was made conscientiously and with careful deliberation." This decision maintains…
Descriptors: Academic Failure, Court Litigation, Decision Making, Due Process
Peer reviewedClowes, Darrel A. – Journal of Law and Education, 1973
Examines the court influenced changes in student-college relationships. Finds that tests of regulations currently used by courts include such terms as substantial justification,'' appropriate reason,'' chilling effect,'' or prior restraint.'' (JF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Due Process, Higher Education, School Law
PDF pending restorationLarson, A. William – 1974
Awareness of, and accord with, the requirements of the law are only a part of the process of making rights and responsibilities meaningful. Sensitive, forward-looking school administrators should seize the day to eliminate a potential cause of future disruptions, with attendant confrontation politics, by establishing procedural due process -- PDP…
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Administrators, Arbitration, Due Process
Hillman, Larry W.; And Others – 1972
This document on the Civil Rights of Students, perpared by the Educational Opportunities Planning Center, provides a synthesis of presentations made by the author and of the three discussion and answer sessions that followed at the three meetings of the School Law Conferences. Opening remarks emphasize the need for educators to respond to…
Descriptors: Activism, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Discipline
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Interior), Albuquerque, NM. – 1976
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) operates approximately 222 schools, ranging from small 1-2 teacher day schools to large residential boarding schools. In September 1974, the BIA established student rights and due process procedures. All BIA schools were to develop a student rights and responsibility (SRR) program, initiated at the local school…
Descriptors: Agency Role, American Indians, Due Process, Evaluation
