Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Recall (Psychology) | 3 |
Study | 3 |
Cues | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Criteria | 1 |
Efficiency | 1 |
Intervals | 1 |
Knowledge Level | 1 |
Learning Processes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Rawson, Katherine A. | 3 |
Dunlosky, John | 1 |
Kintsch, Walter | 1 |
Pyc, Mary A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Ohio | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pyc, Mary A.; Rawson, Katherine A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Although the memorial benefits of testing are well established empirically, the mechanisms underlying this benefit are not well understood. The authors evaluated the mediator shift hypothesis, which states that test-restudy practice is beneficial for memory because retrieval failures during practice allow individuals to evaluate the effectiveness…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Study, Theories
Rawson, Katherine A.; Dunlosky, John – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011
The literature on testing effects is vast but supports surprisingly few prescriptive conclusions for how to schedule practice to achieve both durable and efficient learning. Key limitations are that few studies have examined the effects of initial learning criterion or the effects of relearning, and no prior research has examined the combined…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Efficiency, Time Management, Memory
Rawson, Katherine A.; Kintsch, Walter – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2004
Two experiments were conducted (a) to evaluate how providing background information at test may benefit retrieval and (b) to further examine how providing background information prior to study influences encoding. Half of the participants read background information prior to study, and the other half did not. In each group, half were presented…
Descriptors: Cues, Recall (Psychology), Student Evaluation, Cognitive Processes