NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Su, Ningxin; Buchin, Zachary L.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Retrieval enhances subsequent memory more than restudy (i.e., the testing effect), demonstrating the encoding (or reencoding) effects of retrieval. It is important to delineate the nature of the encoding effects of retrieval especially in comparison to traditional encoding processes. The current study examined if the level of retrieval, analogous…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Memory, Study, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Buchin, Zachary L.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
Memory retrieval often enhances later memory compared with restudying (i.e., the testing effect), indicating that retrieval does not simply reveal but also modifies memory representations. Dividing attention (DA) during encoding greatly disrupts later memory performance while DA during retrieval typically has modest effects--but what of the…
Descriptors: Attention, Memory, Cognitive Processes, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Although retrieval often enhances subsequent memory (the testing effect), a negative testing effect has recently been documented in which prior retrieval harms later recall compared with restudying. The negative testing effect was predicated on the negative generation effect and the item-specific-relational framework. The present experiments…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Testing, Study, Time