NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zawadzka, Katarzyna; Baloro, Samantha; Wells, Jennifer; Wilding, Edward L.; Hanczakowski, Maciej – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Encoding variability refers to the situation in which repeated items are processed in different ways on each presentation. Superior memory performance resulting from encoding variability is sometimes argued to underlie important phenomena in human memory such as the spacing effect. However, the memory benefits of encoding variability are often…
Descriptors: Memory, Repetition, Cognitive Processes, Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Su, Ningxin; Buchin, Zachary L.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Retrieval enhances subsequent memory more than restudy (i.e., the testing effect), demonstrating the encoding (or reencoding) effects of retrieval. It is important to delineate the nature of the encoding effects of retrieval especially in comparison to traditional encoding processes. The current study examined if the level of retrieval, analogous…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Memory, Study, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Buchin, Zachary L.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
Memory retrieval often enhances later memory compared with restudying (i.e., the testing effect), indicating that retrieval does not simply reveal but also modifies memory representations. Dividing attention (DA) during encoding greatly disrupts later memory performance while DA during retrieval typically has modest effects--but what of the…
Descriptors: Attention, Memory, Cognitive Processes, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Although retrieval often enhances subsequent memory (the testing effect), a negative testing effect has recently been documented in which prior retrieval harms later recall compared with restudying. The negative testing effect was predicated on the negative generation effect and the item-specific-relational framework. The present experiments…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Testing, Study, Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pyc, Mary A.; Rawson, Katherine A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Although the memorial benefits of testing are well established empirically, the mechanisms underlying this benefit are not well understood. The authors evaluated the mediator shift hypothesis, which states that test-restudy practice is beneficial for memory because retrieval failures during practice allow individuals to evaluate the effectiveness…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Study, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kimball, Daniel R.; Smith, Troy A.; Muntean, William J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
A widely held assumption in metamemory is that better, more accurate metamemory monitoring leads to better, more efficacious restudy decisions, reflected in better memory performance--we refer to this causal chain as the "restudy selectivity hypothesis". In 3 sets of experiments, we tested this hypothesis by factorially manipulating…
Descriptors: Memory, Metacognition, Study, Self Control
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Finley, Jason R.; Benjamin, Aaron S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Three experiments demonstrated learners' abilities to adaptively and qualitatively accommodate their encoding strategies to the demands of an upcoming test. Stimuli were word pairs. In Experiment 1, test expectancy was induced for either cued recall (of targets given cues) or free recall (of targets only) across 4 study-test cycles of the same…
Descriptors: Learning Strategies, Adjustment (to Environment), Tests, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ariel, Robert – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Learners typically allocate more resources to learning items that are higher in value than they do to items lower in value. For instance, when items vary in point value for learning, participants allocate more study time to the higher point items than they do to the lower point items. The current experiments extend this research to a context where…
Descriptors: Time Management, Experience, Study, Paired Associate Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kornell, Nate; Metcalfe, Janet – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
One of the most important reasons to investigate human metacognition is its role in directing how people study. However, limited evidence exists that metacognitively guided study benefits learning. Three experiments are presented that provide evidence for this link. In Experiment 1, participants' learning was enhanced when they were allowed to…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Study, Learning, Educational Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Criss, Amy H.; Shiffrin, Richard M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
In studies of episodic recognition memory, low-frequency words (LF) have higher hit rates (HR) and lower false alarm rates (FAR) than do high-frequency words (HF), which is known as the mirror pattern. A few findings have suggested that requiring a task at study may reduce or eliminate the LF-HR advantage without altering the LF-FAR effect. Other…
Descriptors: Word Frequency, Language Processing, Recognition (Psychology), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koriat, Asher; Ma'ayan, Hilit; Sheffer, Limor; Bjork, Robert A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Judgments of learning (JOLs) underestimate the increase in recall that occurs with repeated study (the underconfidence-with-practice effect; UWP). The authors explore an account in terms of a foresight bias in which JOLs are inflated when the to-be-recalled target highlights aspects of the cue that are not transparent when the cue appears alone…
Descriptors: Mnemonics, Bias, Learning, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koriat, Asher; Bjork, Robert A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
The monitoring of one's own knowledge during study suffers from an inherent discrepancy between study and test situations: Judgments of learning (JOLs) are made in the presence of information that is absent but solicited during testing. The failure to discount the effects of that information when making JOLs can instill a sense of competence…
Descriptors: Testing, Self Esteem, Knowledge Level, Metacognition