Descriptor
| Psychological Studies | 3 |
| Research Methodology | 3 |
| Suffixes | 3 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Flow Charts | 2 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
| Tables (Data) | 2 |
| Acoustics | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
| Charts | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| British Journal of Psychology | 3 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMorton, John; Chambers, Susan M. – British Journal of Psychology, 1976
Under conditions of serial recall of auditorily presented lists of digits, recall of the last item has been shown to be adversely affected by the presence of a redundant item following the list. It is shown that the size of this effect, the suffix effect, is not influenced by the phonological complexity of the suffix. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Acoustics, Auditory Perception, Charts, Psychological Studies
Peer reviewedSalter, D.; And Others – British Journal of Psychology, 1976
Discusses two propositions about the preliminary stages of acoustic analysis and encoding in the absence of focal attention. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Codification, Diagrams, Experiments, Flow Charts
Peer reviewedSalter, David; Osler, Jim – British Journal of Psychology, 1978
Two experiments investigated serial recall with eight-word lists in which the frequency rating of the terminal word was manipulated. The effect on recall of two kinds of verbal "stimulus suffix" as well as a control noise suffix was also tested. Recall for the terminal items in the lists was analyzed. (Editor)
Descriptors: Auditory Stimuli, Experiments, Flow Charts, Psychological Studies
