The language impaired Ss consistently performed better than Ss matched for mean length of utterance but more poorly than MA matched peers. Only one task, haptic recognition, uncovered a significant difference between the language impaired and MA matched groups. Results suggested that language impaired Ss had deficient nonlinguistic symbolic…

Examination of hypothesis-testing and nonlinguistic symbolic abilities of 10 language impaired and 10 language normal children revealed that language impaired Ss performed significantly more poorly than controls on haptic recognition tasks and on a portion of the discrimination learning task. No differences were found between the groups' concept…