Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 3 |
Syntax | 3 |
Written Language | 3 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Grammar | 2 |
Second Language Instruction | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Writing Evaluation | 2 |
Writing Instruction | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Eckstein, Grant | 1 |
Leow, Ronald P. | 1 |
Leow, Stephanie A. | 1 |
Rohm, Lisa | 1 |
Sims, Maureen | 1 |
Storch, Neomy | 1 |
Tapper, Joanna | 1 |
Thinglum, Anne | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Eckstein, Grant; Sims, Maureen; Rohm, Lisa – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
Dynamic written corrective feedback (DWCF) is a pedagogical approach that offers meaningful, manageable, constant, and timely corrective feedback on student writing (Hartshorn et al., 2010). It emphasizes indirect and comprehensive written error correction on short, daily writing assignments. Numerous studies have demonstrated that its use can…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Error Correction, Time Factors (Learning)
Leow, Ronald P.; Thinglum, Anne; Leow, Stephanie A. – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
Whether type of written corrective feedback (WCF) impacts L2 learning has been investigated for decades. While many product-oriented studies report conflicting findings, the paucity of studies adopting both a process-oriented and curricular approach (e.g., Caras, 2019) underscores the call for further research on: (1) the processing dimension of…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Spanish

Storch, Neomy; Tapper, Joanna – System, 1996
Investigates the use of an annotation scheme in which students identify their own concerns through marginal or end-notes addressed to their teachers. The study's analysis focused on form, content, and students' views. Results indicate that students annotated mainly for syntax and lexis, in the form of confirmation requests. (21 references)…
Descriptors: College Students, Dialog Journals, English (Second Language), English for Academic Purposes