NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Waddell, Morgan L.; Amazeen, Eric L. – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2020
Purpose: The current study investigated the effect of attention on heaviness perception and its physiological and kinematic contributions. Method: Participants lifted objects that varied in mass and volume while their muscle activity and movement were recorded. Participants were instructed to pay attention to their arm (internal) or the object…
Descriptors: Kinesthetic Perception, Athletics, Scientific Concepts, Human Body
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
O'connor, Justen; Alfrey, Laura; Payne, Phillip – Sport, Education and Society, 2012
Acknowledging the performative sporting discourses which continue to dominate physical education, and the emerging focus on disease prevention within this context, this paper presents a socio-ecological framework for physical education that aims to shift the focus towards more multidimensional understandings of what it means to be "physically…
Descriptors: Physical Education, Body Composition, Physical Activities, Prevention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Comalli, Peter E., Jr.; Altshuler, Morton W. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Comparative Analysis, Human Posture, Kinesthetic Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Platt, Douglas; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Figural Aftereffects, Kinesthetic Perception
Hritzuk, John; Taylor, Lorne – 1970
Students were classed as field dependent or field independent using Witkin's Rod and Frame and the Embedded Figures Test. In addition, each of the 269 grade 8 subjects performed Uznadze's set tasks. The number of trials required for excitation and extinction in the haptic and visual modality were noted. The field-dependent-independent groups,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Performance Factors, Relationship, Secondary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Churchill, A. V. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Kinesthetic Perception, Lateral Dominance, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathes, Sharon; Flatten, Kay – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
To assess the performance characteristics of synthetic and leather basketballs, individuals were asked to discriminate perceptually between the leather and synthetic basketballs under four treatment conditions. Rebound characteristics on five playing surfaces were measured. Leather basketballs rebounded significantly higher; no significant…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Basketball, Evaluation, Kinesthetic Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Derrick, Ellen; Dewar, Robert – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Error Patterns, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cronin, Virginia – Developmental Psychology, 1973
Study shows that there are differences in the information-processing capacities of touch and vision and that these differences are influenced by a variety of factors. (Author)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Learning Modalities, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fishkin, Steven M.; Pishkin, Vladimir – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schneiderman, Della Z. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Child Development, Discrimination Learning, Learning Processes, Learning Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pring, Linda – International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1989
Performance of congenitally blind children and blindfolded children was compared on tasks requiring spatial reasoning and shape recognition. Blind subjects performed at least as well as blindfolded subjects on simple two-dimensional tactual processing tasks, but less well on more complex tasks requiring them to store, compare, and label objects.…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Blindness, Cognitive Processes, Congenital Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cronin, Virginia – Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, 1982
Reports the results of two experiments dealing with children's visual and tactual performance. In the first task, after several presentations of a series, the tactual group made almost errorless discriminations. But with memory demands, tactual performance became poorer than visual performance. Found a large developmental difference. (JAC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning
Letchworth, George A.; And Others – 1978
Performance of forward observer students from the Army Field Artillery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma was investigated in relation to several learner variables. Learner variables were field dependent/independent cognitive style, visual/haptic perceptual style, trait anxiety, scores on the Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Tests, and achievement scores…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Anxiety, Cognitive Style, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bentzen, Billie Louise; Peck, Alec F. – Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1979
To facilitate appropriate line choice for tactile graphic displays, 42 visually impaired Ss traced four types of tactile lines in a simple display (without intersections), and in a complex display (having intersections). (Author)
Descriptors: Graphic Arts, Performance Factors, Research Projects, Tactual Perception
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2