Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Talent | 6 |
Intelligence Tests | 5 |
Gifted | 4 |
Children | 3 |
Cognitive Ability | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Adults | 2 |
Cognitive Development | 2 |
Cognitive Tests | 2 |
Intelligence Quotient | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bain, Sherry K. | 1 |
Branagan, Alexandra M. | 1 |
Burko, Jordan A. | 1 |
Cao, Thuy Hong | 1 |
Corn, Anne L. | 1 |
Dunn, Linda W. | 1 |
Haensly, Patricia A. | 1 |
Jaspers, Kathryn E. | 1 |
Jung, Jae Yup | 1 |
Lee, Jihyun | 1 |
Lee, Kyung Sook | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Test Authors Speak: Reporting on an Author Survey of the Leading Tests Used in Gifted Assessment
Valler, Emilee C.; Burko, Jordan A.; Pfeiffer, Steven I.; Branagan, Alexandra M. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2017
The conceptualization of giftedness continues to be a widely debated topic within the field. Recently, there has been a shift from a psychometric view of giftedness to inclusion of conative and contextual factors. How one defines and conceptualizes "gifted" drives assessment and identification practices. Conceptualization also guides the…
Descriptors: Gifted, Authors, Mixed Methods Research, Children
Cao, Thuy Hong; Jung, Jae Yup; Lee, Jihyun – Journal of Advanced Academics, 2017
Assessment is a crucial component of gifted education. Not only does it facilitate the recognition of the potential and specific needs of gifted students, it also monitors the progress and growth of gifted students, and allows for the evaluation of gifted education programs. In the present review, we synthesize the literature on assessment in…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Talent
Bain, Sherry K.; Jaspers, Kathryn E. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2010
This article presents a review of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition (KBIT-2; Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004b), which is designed to provide a brief, individualized format for measuring verbal and nonverbal intelligence in children and adults from the ages of 4 years, 0 months through 90 years, 11 months. The test consists of only…
Descriptors: Job Applicants, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Test Reviews

Dunn, Linda W.; Corn, Anne L.; Morelock, Martha J. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2004
This investigation compared fantasy-proneness levels and IQ scores in gifted adolescents with primary talent areas in 1 of 4 domains: mathematics, computer science, creative writing, and chemistry. The Inventory of Childhood Memories and Imaginings: Children's Form (ICMIC; Myers, 1983) was used to assess fantasy-proneness. IQ scores were generated…
Descriptors: Investigations, Adolescents, Talent, Intelligence Tests

Haensly, Patricia A.; Lee, Kyung Sook – 1995
Noting that the identification of exceptional potential in young children must become a better informed process in order to provide appropriate schooling to develop that potential, the purpose of this study was to extend knowledge of the many ways in which emerging gifted ability in children from diverse backgrounds may show itself in home and…
Descriptors: Ability, Developmentally Appropriate Practices, Exceptional Child Research, Gifted Disadvantaged
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1992
The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised were administered in counterbalanced order to a sample of 32 school identified gifted and talented students (18 males and 14 females). Mean age was 11 years, 3 months. The K-BIT IQ Composite and SIT-R Total Standard Score produced a correlation of .61 (p < .001).…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academically Gifted, Children, Comparative Testing