Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Task Analysis | 1 |
| Theories | 1 |
| Young Children | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Developmental Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkStanovich, Keith E.; West, Richard F.; Toplak, Maggie E. – Developmental Review, 2011
Drawing developmental predictions from dual-process theories is more complex than is commonly realized. Overly simplified predictions drawn from such models may lead to premature rejection of the dual process approach as one of many tools for understanding cognitive development. Misleading predictions can be avoided by paying attention to several…
Descriptors: Prediction, Cognitive Development, Theories, Task Analysis
