NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beck, Victoria – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2014
Much has been written about student and faculty opinions on academic integrity in testing. Currently, concerns appear to focus more narrowly on online testing, generally based on anecdotal assumptions that online students are more likely to engage in academic dishonesty in testing than students in traditional on-campus courses. To address such…
Descriptors: College Students, College Faculty, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marksteiner, Tamara; Reinhard, Marc-Andre; Dickhauser, Oliver; Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2012
The present study explores how well teacher trainees can detect liars. Moreover, a new method was applied to investigate beliefs that teacher trainees hold about liars. The results indicate that, overall, teacher trainees were not better than chance in detecting true and invented stories. Generally, participants reported to have used only a few…
Descriptors: Nonverbal Communication, Cues, Credibility, Preservice Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hoshiar, Mitra; Dunlap, Jody; Li, Jinyi; Friedel, Janice Nahra – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2014
Online learning is rapidly becoming one of the most prevalent delivery methods of learning in institutions of higher education. It provides college students, especially adult students, an alternative, convenient, and cost-efficient method to earn their credentials, upgrade their skills and knowledge, and keep or upgrade their employment. But at…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Electronic Learning, Two Year College Students, Faculty Development
Stevens, Tanisha N. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Research reveals that reducing academic misconduct requires an understanding of factors that influence the two key stakeholders in the epidemic: students who engage in academically dishonest behaviors and faculty who are charged with the responsibility of reporting and deterring the behavior (e.g., Prenshaw, Straughan & Albers-Miller, 2000).…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, College Faculty, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hard, Stephen F.; Conway, James M.; Moran, Antonia C. – Journal of Higher Education, 2006
This study investigated faculty and college student beliefs concerning student academic misconduct. Faculty beliefs predicted efforts to prevent misconduct and efforts to challenge it. Student beliefs predicted frequency of misconduct. Faculty and students overestimated the extent of misconduct, students to a greater degree. Faculty who…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes
Brandes, Barbara – 1986
A study was conducted in California to explore the extent of cheating, its relationship to personal and situational factors, and the actions of school personnel to promote academic honesty and responsibility. Questionnaires were completed by 1,037 sixth-graders, 2,265 secondary school students (mostly 11th-graders), and 109 school staff members.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age Differences, Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education
Monsaas, Judith A.; Engelhard, George, Jr. – 1991
The purpose of this research was to investigate whether teachers' attitudes toward specific test preparation, whether they saw administration practices such as cheating, and the amount of pressure they felt to increase standardized test scores predicted teachers' test preparation and administration practices. Using the theory of personal action of…
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Cheating, Educational Practices, Elementary School Teachers