Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 10 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 11 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 14 |
Teacher Student Relationship | 14 |
Written Language | 14 |
Second Language Learning | 11 |
English (Second Language) | 10 |
Feedback (Response) | 10 |
Foreign Countries | 9 |
Second Language Instruction | 8 |
Teaching Methods | 7 |
Student Attitudes | 6 |
Language Teachers | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Amrhein, Hannah R. | 1 |
Apisak Sukying | 1 |
Austin, Theresa Y. | 1 |
Britton, Emma R. | 1 |
Cheng, An | 1 |
Falhasiri, Mohammad | 1 |
Hyland, Fiona | 1 |
Hyland, Ken | 1 |
Isnawati, Ida | 1 |
Jing, Huang | 1 |
Koshik, Irene | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 14 |
Reports - Research | 14 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zheng, Yao; Yu, Shulin; Liu, Zhuoyao – Teaching in Higher Education, 2023
While research on written corrective feedback (WCF) has proliferated over the past three decades, scant attention has been paid to how lower-proficiency (LP) students engage with teacher WCF in specific contexts and why they (dis)engage in the ways they do. This case study explored two Chinese LP students' engagement with teacher WCF in English…
Descriptors: College Students, Low Achievement, Feedback (Response), Written Language
Yilin Jiang; Apisak Sukying – International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2024
The objective of this study is to develop literacy engagement in Chinese students with varying language proficiencies through teacher-written corrective feedback. Drawing on Bandura's social cognitive theory and Boekaerts and Corno's self-regulation theory, the research aims to understand how corrective feedback influences literacy engagement and…
Descriptors: Language Proficiency, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Error Correction
Tran, Dung – MEXTESOL Journal, 2020
This study explored ESL students' comments on teacher's written corrective feedback in a freshman composition class to find out whether they thought positively about the feedback and how they perceived the power relationship with the teacher. The study followed a qualitative design. Thirteen ESL students were asked to comment on the teacher's…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Student Attitudes, Written Language
Impacts of Teacher-Written Corrective Feedback with Teacher-Student Conference on Students' Revision
Isnawati, Ida; Sulistyo, Gunadi Harry; Widiati, Utami; Suryati, Nunung – International Journal of Instruction, 2019
Although providing students with teacher written corrective feedback for their writing is considered critical, research has not come to conclusive findings on which form of written corrective feedback can best promote students' learning. Students still face a lot of problems in making sense of written corrective feedback from their teachers.…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Evaluation
Falhasiri, Mohammad – TESL Canada Journal, 2022
For corrective feedback (CF) to contribute to second language (L2) development, some cognitive processes need to be completed. Learners need to notice and comprehend the CF, reflect on and deeply process it, and finally integrate it into their interlanguage (Gass, 1997). Written languaging (WL), which requires learners to explicitly explain to…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Cognitive Processes
Britton, Emma R.; Austin, Theresa Y. – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
According to sociocultural theory (SCT), corrective feedback (CF) entails a negotiation process whereby writing instructors support second language (L2) writers in self-correction and provide a level of guidance needed for writers to actively engage in revision tasks (Aljaafreh & Lantolf, 1994). Drawing on SCT, this collaborative self-study…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Critical Incidents Method
Said, Khalid; Mouzrati, Abdelouahid El – Arab World English Journal, 2018
The present study seeks to lay the foundations for a firmly-grounded understanding of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) as a Formative Assessment (FA) tool through student writing. More specifically yet, it is concerned with examining the intricate correlation between Moroccan English Language Teachers' (ELT) attitudes and practices with respect…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Teacher Student Relationship, Language Teachers
Nurie, Yenus – PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 2019
This study examines doctoral students' needs and preferences for written feedback on thesis writing from supervisors. Several studies have explored students' preferences for written feedback to respond to students writing in the classroom. However, relatively little or no research has been previously reported about what aspects of written feedback…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Doctoral Students, Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes
Saeli, Hooman; Cheng, An – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2019
This project firstly explored Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) students' perceptions about written corrective feedback (WCF)-related practices and preferences. Secondly, the student participants' first language (L1; e.g., Farsi) learner identities were operationalized, especially focusing on the skill of writing, WCF, and…
Descriptors: Grammar, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Jing, Huang; Xiaodong, Hao; Yu, Liu – English Language Teaching, 2016
As is known to all, errors are inevitable in the process of language learning for Chinese students. Should we ignore students' errors in learning English? In common with other questions, different people hold different opinions. All teachers agree that errors students make in written English are not allowed. For the errors students make in oral…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Oral Language, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Amrhein, Hannah R.; Nassaji, Hossein – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee, 2010
A growing body of research has examined the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) for L2 writing. An area that has attracted considerable attention recently is how students and teachers perceive the usefulness of WCF. Most research in this area, however, has focused on students' perspectives, while many fewer studies comparing…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Error Correction, Teacher Student Relationship

Koshik, Irene – Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2002
Uses a conversation analytic framework to analyze a practice used by teachers in 1-0-1, second language writing conferences when eliciting self-correction of students' written language errors. This type of turn used to elicit a knowledge display from the student is labeled designedly incomplete utterance (DIU). Teachers use DIUs made up of…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Error Correction, Language Teachers, Second Language Learning

Hyland, Fiona; Hyland, Ken – Journal of Second Language Writing, 2001
Offers a detailed text analysis of written feedback given by two teachers of English-as-a-Second-Language students. Considers this feedback in terms of it functions as praise, criticism, and suggestions. Explores the motivations for these through teacher interviews and think-aloud protocols and examines cases where students failed to understand…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Error Correction, Feedback, Interviews

Lee, Icy – System, 1997
Investigates English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) students' performance in error correction in writing and discusses the pedagogical implications that arise from the study. Findings reveal that students' major difficulty is failure to detect errors. Pedagogical implications indicate that error feedback is superior to overt correction and that some…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, English (Second Language), Error Correction