Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Adam Kho | 1 |
Gary T. Henry | 1 |
Jefferson, Anton | 1 |
Kirshner, Ben | 1 |
Lam Pham | 1 |
Rodriguez, Luis A. | 1 |
Ron Zimmer | 1 |
Springer, Matthew G. | 1 |
Swain, Walker A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Race to the Top | 3 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rodriguez, Luis A.; Swain, Walker A.; Springer, Matthew G. – American Educational Research Journal, 2020
The federal Race to the Top initiative signified a shift in American education policy whereby accountability efforts moved from the school to the teacher level. Using administrative data from Tennessee, we explore whether evaluation reforms differentially influenced mobility patterns for teachers of varying effectiveness. We find that the rollout…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Job Performance, Teacher Transfer
Adam Kho; Gary T. Henry; Ron Zimmer; Lam Pham – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2019
Many districts and states have begun implementing incentives to attract high-performing teachers to low-performing schools. Previous research has found that these incentives are effective. However, effects on the schools and students these teachers leave behind has not been examined. This study focuses on the general equilibrium effects of…
Descriptors: School Turnaround, Incentives, Teacher Effectiveness, Institutional Characteristics
Kirshner, Ben; Jefferson, Anton – Teachers College Record, 2015
Background/Context:Federal policy, as codified in Race to the Top (RTT) funding guidelines, outlines four types of intervention: turnaround, restart, closure, and transformation. RTT has embraced a technocratic paradigm for school reform that frames choice less as the opportunity for the public to deliberate about what it wants from its schools…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Intervention, Social Justice