Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
College Students | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Learning Processes | 2 |
Learning Strategies | 2 |
Questionnaires | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
Active Learning | 1 |
Blended Learning | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Dawood, Fauziah K. P. | 1 |
Ellis, Robert A. | 1 |
Hoay, Kuan Chin | 1 |
Jen, Leong Siok | 1 |
Yew, Tee Meng | 1 |
a/p Palaniappa Manickam, M.… | 1 |
a/p S. Narayansany, Kannaki | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Study Process Questionnaire | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yew, Tee Meng; Dawood, Fauziah K. P.; a/p S. Narayansany, Kannaki; a/p Palaniappa Manickam, M. Kamala; Jen, Leong Siok; Hoay, Kuan Chin – Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2016
When students and teachers behave in ways that reinforce learning as a spectator sport, the result can often be a classroom and overall learning environment that is mostly limited to transmission of information and rote learning rather than deep approaches towards meaningful construction and application of knowledge. A group of college instructors…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communities of Practice, Action Research, Active Learning
Ellis, Robert A. – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014
Evaluating the quality of inquiry using technology in blended contexts at university is a complex phenomenon as there are many variables which could account for qualitative variation in the experience. This study looks at reasons for qualitative variation in the university student experience of inquiry using technologies. It considers approaches…
Descriptors: Inquiry, Blended Learning, College Students, Educational Quality