Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Teaching Methods | 3 |
| Blended Learning | 2 |
| Course Evaluation | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Asynchronous Communication | 1 |
| College Environment | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| Credentials | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Distance Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Moskal, Patsy | 3 |
| Dziuban, Charles | 1 |
| Fottler, Myron | 1 |
| Futch, Linda | 1 |
| Liberman, Aaron | 1 |
| Rotarius, Timothy | 1 |
| Scharoun, Kourtney | 1 |
| Thompson, Kelvin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
| Florida | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Moskal, Patsy; Thompson, Kelvin; Futch, Linda – Online Learning, 2015
BlendKit is a 5-week course designed by the University of Central Florida in an open, online format specifically for the professional development of higher education faculty and designers preparing to design and teach blended learning courses. The evaluation of this course provides us with interesting and valuable information on the success of…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Professional Development, Higher Education, College Faculty
Moskal, Patsy – Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2009
The 2008 Sloan Blended Workshop evaluation track provided participants with ideas, methods, and resources with which to design and evaluate their courses, programs, and blended initiatives. The many questions that arose from participants at the Workshop provided the motivation to document our University's evaluation experiences at course, program…
Descriptors: Workshops, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Longitudinal Studies
Liberman, Aaron; Scharoun, Kourtney; Rotarius, Timothy; Fottler, Myron; Dziuban, Charles; Moskal, Patsy – Journal of Faculty Development, 2005
This study seeks to determine the level of acceptance of the Constructive Engagement Method (CEM) as a teaching, learning, and leadership skills development model. Employing a modified debate format, constructive engagement requires active student participation, even among the most introverted of students, and it fosters a learning environment…
Descriptors: Leadership, Debate, Student Participation, Leadership Qualities

Peer reviewed
Direct link
