Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Attitude Change | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Educational Philosophy | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Afiya Fredericks | 1 |
| Andrei Cimpian | 1 |
| Diego Catalán Molina | 1 |
| Kali Trzesniewski | 1 |
| Lisa S. Blackwell | 1 |
| Sylvia Roberts | 1 |
| Tenelle Porter | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkTenelle Porter; Diego Catalán Molina; Andrei Cimpian; Sylvia Roberts; Afiya Fredericks; Lisa S. Blackwell; Kali Trzesniewski – Grantee Submission, 2022
School underachievement is a persistent problem in the United States. Direct-to-student, computer-delivered growth-mindset interventions have shown promise as a way to improve achievement for students at risk of failing in school; however, these interventions benefit only students who happen to be in classrooms that support growth-mindset beliefs.…
Descriptors: Underachievement, Intervention, Academic Achievement, At Risk Students
